Quote (Santara @ Dec 11 2017 02:01pm)
Why exactly is the content of the globe (or lack thereof) relevant to a flat Earth discussion?
Try to read thread - its about globe Earth
Quote (remco6 @ Dec 11 2017 04:16pm)
Being brain damaged cause you to think not having developed technology to drill or take photos though 6000km of rock proves .... I’m not even sure what he could possibly think this proves tbh
but the real brain damaged are the ones who think Earth has a core cause they saw some cartoon, who would be that pathetic though right?
Or people who think we actually went to the moon, must suck to have such a low iq to believe that shite.
Quote (Thor123422 @ Dec 11 2017 02:17pm)
Part of my research was defining the central point of a molecule.
Is it the average with respect to weight distribution? Or number of electrons? Is it the simple average of all atomic positions?
Funny thing happens in science that there's about ten meaningful ways to define any concept.
yes but he doesn't realize that the argument that any two points on an airplane at 35,000 ft is always level with the center point of earth loses any validity the moment you make the earth not a perfect sphere and if that's that case the Globe Earth/Gravity excuse has even more wrong with it.
This is what Globe earth does, make excuses for one fault, which then makes something else faulty and if you notice that fault, they'll just make up another excuse to cover up that. This is the problem with lying , they just get bigger and bigger every time you tell the tale.
This post was edited by card_sultan on Dec 11 2017 09:38pm