Quote (lodd222 @ Mar 22 2022 02:10pm)

What was this alleged mistake you say god has made? time to stop generalizing & dodging now kiddo.
You're getting called out.

Quote (DaJockaz @ Mar 22 2022 01:11pm)

are you the guy who can't spell Mario Kart?

Quote (oDJackaz @ Mar 22 2022 10:11am)

are you the guy who can't spell Mario Kart?

Quote (lolkggz @ Mar 22 2022 10:10am)

You keep worshiping the murderer of over 24 million people.
I'll continue to avoid it.

Live your life boomie.

Quote (lodd222 @ Mar 22 2022 02:19pm)

aren't you the jackass sig guy who lives up to his image?




Broken record much?

You are given choice and with moral choices come freedom,
you choose hatred for god and abandonment of natural wisdom which makes you a slave to a murderous reality that chose the same.

You are blaming a farmer for picking good crops from his harvest & tilling the rest, you chose to be rotten just remember.

Quote (Surfpunk @ Mar 22 2022 01:42pm)

Quote (Diutinus @ Mar 22 2022 01:46pm)

That surely wouldn't make this spam, would it?

Quote (Surfpunk @ Mar 22 2022 03:10pm)

Not if you're a mod, it wouldn't

Quote (death_knight @ Mar 23 2022 02:51am)

First, I prefer to exclude the Bible because it's a dead end for me (has resulted in confusion, conjecture and pseudoscience). I am not completely unwilling to read the bible though I think it's fair to say "Show me evidence #2 unrelated to #1 (a book)".

Second, in reply to the 'monkey to man': Genetically speaking, Darwinism appears to be correct as it complies with the scientific method. Every living thing shares core DNA and this lineage can be traced back to the Greatest Common Ancestor. This implies we co-evolved with every other organism alive today and is apprent in our physical makeup (symmetry, organ placement and behavior). Does this qualify as proof in my eyes? No because there is still much to learn of chemistry and genetics. However as it agrees with scientific method it stands to reason that any other theory must meet or exceed the same criteria (time investigating and the provided results of engineers and scientists). I have yet to observe a single "religious scientist" that follows the same scrutiny as the rest of accepted science. So in the context of Darwinism, your bible is not evidence for anything because it does not follow the same scrutiny nor does it cite quantifiable facts the same as an academic paper driven by the scientific method (Theory, Experiment, Observe, Conclude, Repeat, Theory, Experiment etc.). Science (learning) is not a conclusive art rather it is a life long process subject to constant updates in what we know and what we think we know. Obviously this is a complete contrast to people who "know" God exists and "know" what happens after we die. By any other measure, the knowledge of the above sentence is generally agreed by academics to be beyond our capabilities of measurement and so falls in the category of conjecture and/or pseudoscience.