Quote (card_sultan @ Dec 11 2017 02:56pm)
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
you cant prove we're on a sphere
why would that matter? we're talking about the theoretical attributes of both the round and flat earth, reality isn't even a part of said hypothetical, because its a hypothetical.
but there is no hypothetical where any point on a sphere is any further from the center and any other point, so traveling on it's surface can't be described as travelling "up" or "down", not even hypothetically.
Quote (card_sultan @ Dec 11 2017 02:59pm)
I know - these guys just dodge proving we are on a sphere, cause they cant do it and just troll the crap outta anyone who questions your religious dogma
in the absence of photographic evidence (because some idiot discounted all of it as fake) one must employ hypothetical models.
thanks AGAIN for proving my point inside of 5 mins of me making it.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 11 2017 03:01pm