Even if it were flat, why do you care so much?
Still haven't answered this question.

Well astronaut Chris Hadfield said it takes about 9 minutes to cross the entire us and knowing the exposure times for near dusk photography - if this was a satellite like nasa claims - it would be traveling so fast it would be a streak of light.

another dodge, you can't explain why you care so much so obviously just trolling

Good satellite + High resolution camera hooked up to it = HD video or pictures that you can zoom in on your computer to get a good look afterwards.

It would be in your sky long enough to easily get good shots of it though I suggest trying this more than one time, just use those ISS tracker websites to know when it's passing by at night and where to look. Don't use a shitty telescope as well, do your research on high quality ones to buy within your price range.

This post was edited by Metalkon on Feb 27 2017 02:36pm

Fake and gay

Well, why do you care so much that its all ball, and get so angry when someone suggests it not?

Is this why? Does this trigger you?





Very nice, nice deconstruction of that word.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Feb 27 2017 02:37pm

still didn't answer the question. card_trolltan is triggered

still no proof? yawn

I know that picture is at least 10+ years old , and consumer had no access to hd pictues back then and i saw a video someone recently took of the supposed Iss and it was just a streak of light in the sky, it probably took about 2 seconds to pass through the entire sky and the perspective include the earth plane as well so it was a normal perspective , not zoomed in at all.



Answering a question with another question is called "conversation".

Sorry conversations trigger you.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Feb 27 2017 02:45pm