I think your confusing Magnetism with polarity and charge, well actually i know you are.

You dodge as well. I'm not asking for any proof with this

We getting to the sun's light soon on the FE models next if you answer question below based on this.




So would you say approx 20X as suggested?

This post was edited by kai_jph on Dec 9 2017 04:34pm

I can already tell your going to ignore the facts i just told you - cause you not able to see anything beyond what mainstream military propaganda psy-ence tells you and your bias.


Also you didn't answer my question dodge more.

Also i did an experiment that proves you're an idiot - but first answer my question about the size of the sun ok?



This post was edited by card_sultan on Dec 9 2017 04:38pm

I couldn't care less about NASA, I'm trying to help you through this conspiracy delusion you have, where EVERYONE on the planet is against you, that's paranoia man

I asked you 1st

We will establish what you and chivas believe about the day and night cycle in relation to the suns light with this

So can we estimate 20x larger as I suggested? if not what size difference would you suggest/estimate?

This post was edited by kai_jph on Dec 9 2017 04:43pm

Well if you give up Nasa - you have nothing and no proof that it is a spinning ball, gj.

Also everyone on the the plane is not against me, you're just playing the bent consensus card. Most take that blue pill orally, pretty sure where yours was inserted through

NASA is all I have? how do you even make that leap? you are stuck in an endless loop, every time someone says the earth is sphere you automatically make the judgement call that NASA is behind everything, thats paranoia and its bad for your head...

I would have more respect for you, if you were to explain flat earth without bringing up NASA and conspiracy bullshit

This is your test, the fact you wont just say what it is - is proof you trying very badly.

Where in the Scientific Method does it mention that you need to get your opponent's points first

Oh yeah it doesn't - you're just assuming a false equivalency cause heavily biased and desperate

Big Bang is fake

Gravity is fake

Evolution is faulty at best

Dinos being 65 million years old is wrong

No one has ever been to space

Astronomy is a dual system of belief

Math does not prove things

All you have is a nice painting from Nasa and a cartoon of the earth's core

gg faker,

why you being so defensive?

Just accept you're failure

my friend working hard for NASA



This post was edited by card_sultan on Dec 9 2017 04:57pm

oh my god, these are your reasons for believing what the shape of earth is?

nvm I can't help you....

go see a psychiatrist