Quote (tard_sultan @ Feb 25 2017 10:04pm)
yeah its not - he obviously doesn't understand perspective and just misuses to claim he does, part of his confirmation bias to not know hes a dummy.
No, he understands perspective whereas you do not, and he demonstrated at much.
But allow me:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crepuscular_raysQuote
Crepuscular rays /krᵻˈpʌskjᵿlər/ (also known as sunbeams, Angel lights[citation needed], Sun rays or God rays), in atmospheric optics, are rays of sunlight that appear to radiate from the point in the sky where the sun is located. These rays, which stream through gaps in clouds (particularly stratocumulus) or between other objects, are columns of sunlit air separated by darker cloud-shadowed regions. Despite seeming to converge at a point, the rays are in fact near-parallel shafts of sunlight, and their apparent convergence is a perspective effect (similar, for example, to the way that parallel railway lines seem to converge at a point in the distance).
The name comes from their frequent occurrences during twilight hours (those around dawn and dusk), when the contrasts between light and dark are the most obvious. Crepuscular comes from the Latin word "crepusculum", meaning twilight.
Note where it mentions twilight. Where the sun's light isn't coming in vertically, but at a sharp angle.
So when you went to great lengths to write another lie about physics with the following:
Quote (tard_sultan @ Feb 25 2017 10:41pm)
More proof the Crepuscular rays being divergent is not due to perspective:
Horizon lines converge
Vertical lines dont
http://i65.tinypic.com/2uo54k2.jpgIf the sun was really 93 million miles away and the light arrived here on earth completely parallel - the light rays should be seen completely parallel
perspective will not splay out things
that are oriented perpendicular to your plane, The other explanation say that light rays diverge because of the atmosphere and the debate is whether the atmosphere in the Helio Model is
1. )( = Concave
2. () = Convex
but I think it mostly resemble what is called a meniscus or (( <------like that
So from wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_(optics)Convex-concave (meniscus) lenses can be either positive or negative, depending on the relative curvatures of the two surfaces. A negative meniscus lens has a steeper concave surface and is thinner at the centre than at the periphery. Conversely, a positive meniscus lens has a steeper convex surface and is thicker at the centre than at the periphery. An ideal thin lens with "two surfaces of equal curvature" would have zero optical power, meaning that it would
neither converge nor diverge light.If the sun is really 93 million miles away and light rays arrive on Earth completely parallel, and you dont have perspective or light refraction to explain how light rays are divergent:
Sun worship busted yet again.
...know that you got caught in peddling your bullshit again.
Pro tip: the atmosphere of a curved Earth refracts light.
This post was edited by Santara on Feb 26 2017 12:53am