Quote (kai_jph @ Aug 28 2017 09:48pm)
So we reject the ball earth . Cool
Then which model do we follow since all the ones presented by you and chivas contradict the others in some way?
Chivas has even said your model with more land beyond Ice wall is false twice so who's right and wrong?
I mostly believe in the snow globe model like Chivas but have not closed the book on the infinite (more land) model.
There is also the square virtual reality model that is interesting but has some issues and then there's the cube model which is just pretty strange.
The only reason i stay away from injecting a religious overtone in it, is that first off Flat Earth is strictly a Cosmological believe that can and has been adopted by all religions at one point so i cant saw it confirm this particular religion.
The second reason is that most people only think in the B&W - so in this case they think that either you accept all science or you reject all science, and fear that FE is going to bring us back into the Dark ages were we were solely ruled by Religious belief. So that is a blatantly false assertion and just fear logic that would be typical of someone raised to blindly believe fear propaganda. I believe you need to separate Science into Natural and theoretical and that Religion has and can be just as guilty of the same tactics as used in political fear based propaganda and should be more of just a spiritual reference. So basically a pardym shift in the entire Beast/Debt Slave/Military/Entertainment/Political Matrix, thats all....