Still no proof you haven't understood anything? Is it possible someone is this dumb?

Was just thinking the same.

uses assumptions to confirm assumptions.

with that logical disconnect i'm not sure why you waste time researching, just make stuff up. its not like it has to adhere to being proven anyways.

So I looked into the rainbow thing a couple of weeks ago if you Google atmospheric refraction you get
Atmospheric refraction is the deviation of light or other electromagnetic wave from a straight line as it passes through the atmosphere due to the variation in air density as a function of height.
When I was reading it essentially said that light refracts entering our atmosphere as it's moving from one medium (space) to a denser medium ( our atmosphere) just as it would moving from one medium ( air) to another denser medium like a glass prism or dome or w.e this is apparently well understood and documented could anyone confirm this as a viable replacement for a necessary additional medium outside to create rainbows

U seems to have recently discovered conspiracy theories they always pointing on issues, yes there are no complete theory that explain everything in univsere.

u say all space films and photos are faked? wow how come ?
But its okay to believe that earth is flat, Vikings did that too.... oh i forgot its 1000 years ago but still... go ahead

Of course their faked, do you still think we went to the moon and landed on it with a 10,000 lb rocket but it landed so pillow soft it didnt kick up any dust and or leave a crator where it lannded, but the weight of a foot can leave an impression?

you see the 10.000 lb rocket 2 feet away from the moon dusted surface?
you see any sign that ship actually landed, like a crater?




did the rocket kick up any dust? Sure looks so clean you could eat off of that tin foil!

And look at that tiny plastic joint in between the leg and the pad - 3 of those are holding the weight of that lander - do you even know how much a 10,000 lb rocket weighs and this is the best they can do?




Hey where did the Earth go and why is that Astronomy projector being used?



This post was edited by card_sultan on Feb 10 2017 03:30pm

Not really, the refraction index is too small to create enough spectrum separation for a visible rainbow. The effect is still readily visible as the "heat haze" when you can see air sort of shimmer. It also causes mirages on the road during hot summer days, thanks to total internal reflection. It also causes stars to twinkle.
But for a rainbow you still need something denser, like water.

i was seeing pictures like on this page http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~zhuxj/astro/html/venusphase.html#


and here http://atmospheric-dispersion-corrector.com/What-Is-Atmospheric-Dispersion-Corrector.php




can you explain the difference for me please

Gravity.

If gravity is fake, show me analytics of how an airplane flies

That's right you can't cuz ur dumb af