Ag gotcha



right . What proof do you have for all this

Last response was look in the sky. If so how can you tell they aren't floating just below or above the dome?
How much water is above the dome and proof do you have?

Then what are the things that we call Mercury, Venus, Mars and so on?

They look a bit like stars, but appear larger when viewed through a telescope, and they move at different patterns than the stars do.

Thing is, you can verify for yourself the magnification on a telescope.

Meaning if you assume the distance you can calculate the size of the object.

Basically what the math comes to is that if the planet's are below the dome they should be roughly the size of a car, and visible by naked eye from an airplane.

and no one said it did. so you proved nothing and disproved no one. I can say a slipa dee ding dong =/= poot scoota bang bang, it still doesn't mean anything. Even if both of those things meant something on their own it wouldn't mean anything unless someone else disagreed.

As literally no one ever argued putting together "1000 2d side views" to create a "irl 3d optical perspective" your point means nothing, just like both of those made up terms.

we both know you mistakenly thought that's how 3d drafting was done, because thats the only way your sentence makes any semblance of sense. otherwise your post makes zero sense, no one wants to smash 1000 side views together anyways (where'd u even get 1000?). I know u wont admit it though, in fact you'll just respond with "i know u wont admit" back at me like the parrot u are. I'm glad if this major error caused u to research drafting methods though, you seem to have taken my lesson and backed off your statements like a good little doggie. i can herd u like the sheep u r boy.

Which is not the case here.

I mean, I've never seen a planet from an airplane, but that's probably because planes avoid the routes that can see the planets on purpose?