Quote (death_knight @ Aug 26 2021 08:28am)
In the spirit of debate I'll go through your response again. I believe a sound argument should withstand all opposition which mandates that opposition be presented.
What I'm trying to say is I've seen what you speak of. Furthermore it's a classical trait of a weak debater to call it quits early as to save face as Tistuff has suggested I did which can be a compelling observation. But I also strongly believe there quickly comes a point to where many of us are blindly bickering over the internet and no real progress is made, rather seeds of animosity and hatred are sown, which is exactly the responses that I see in this topic. Many losers foolish remarks and trolls with no intent at logical discussion.
Are you suggesting that the original post was coming from a place of no intent at a logical discussion? I am quite confused as to how you came to that conclusion.
Here is the OP:
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=81496210&f=27&p=572743021#p572743021Quote
Ok what research have you done to confirm both the history accuracy of your denomination as well as proof of concept, ie. God exists and you have not mistakenly resolved artifacts of study (incorrect reasoning, records, context etc.) as fact?
That is your opening statement, as you can see I gave my reply.
You then said this:
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=81496210&f=27&p=572962739#p572962739Quote
I got about 10 minutes into a reply going through your message and I'm abandoning that quest. You made some good points but you also made many assumptions and presented unsound logic that I am exhausted thinking on how best to approach this situation and prove my points which I no longer care to do.
Now you're saying this:
Quote
But I also strongly believe there quickly comes a point to where many of us are blindly bickering over the internet and no real progress is made, rather seeds of animosity and hatred are sown, which is exactly the responses that I see in this topic. Many losers foolish remarks and trolls with no intent at logical discussion.
Can you explain to me how you came to the conclusion that you did given the flow of posts?
Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.