d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Globe Earth
Prev12072082092102111933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 223158Replies: 19328Track Topic
Member
Posts: 15,032
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 3.37
#2081
Dec 4 2017 05:36pm
:santa:

That's like the third time ive seen him post the picture of that bridge that DOESN'T exist acting like it does.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Dec 4 2017 05:36pm
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
#2082
Dec 4 2017 05:36pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Dec 4 2017 03:33pm)
sometimes, but what i'm saying is that because someone used a word - it is not proof that actually did something



That's pretty fucking rich coming from you :rofl: x infinity

This post was edited by JohnMiller92 on Dec 4 2017 05:37pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#2083
Dec 4 2017 05:37pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 4 2017 01:32pm)
which would be true if it were built in one piece and dropped onto it's final location. but as it was built in segments, each can be off by it's tolerance and the overall length can remain the same. some hit tolerance, some miss.

did you really not realize that's what i was saying all along? how embarrassing.

I bet you saw that flat earther meme and that's the extent of your engineering knowledge, you probably didn't do any more research. how embarrassing.



that's not what tolerance means either, try again?


saying segmented tolerance mean nothing unless you can prove that that bridge has over 1 mile of curve built into it and since you cant - your faith is smashed
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
#2084
Dec 4 2017 05:38pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Dec 4 2017 03:37pm)
saying segmented tolerance mean nothing unless you can prove that that bridge has over 1 mile of curve built into it and since you cant - your faith is smashed




GLOBE MODEL SMASHED






This post was edited by JohnMiller92 on Dec 4 2017 05:38pm
Member
Posts: 92,978
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
#2085
Dec 4 2017 05:39pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Dec 4 2017 05:37pm)
saying segmented tolerance mean nothing unless you can prove that that bridge has over 1 mile of curve built into it and since you cant - your faith is smashed


the thing about segments is you need to divide the OVERALL by the number of segments. that's what segments are.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#2086
Dec 4 2017 05:39pm
Quote (caswallen @ Dec 4 2017 01:34pm)
oh you mean, like flat earth... its a couple of words that dont really prove anything? k got it


prove 2d reality is the same as 3d optical perspective - thasts right you have none - absolutely none

:rofl:
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
#2087
Dec 4 2017 05:42pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Dec 4 2017 05:25pm)
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/7b/ed/0b/7bed0b732d9a56c56e1d3a726020ecd8--globe-earth-earth-google.jpg

no accounting for over a mile of curve - circle jerk engineering smashed


No proof they didn't account for it

Quote (card_sultan @ Dec 4 2017 05:39pm)
prove 2d reality is the same as 3d optical perspective - thasts right you have none - absolutely none

:rofl:


All we need to prove the two perspectives are the same is an admission that our eyes see by absorbing photons, and that photons move in straight lines through a uniform medium.


Both of these have been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Dec 4 2017 05:43pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#2088
Dec 4 2017 05:42pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 4 2017 01:39pm)
the thing about segments is you need to divide the OVERALL by the number of segments. that's what segments are.


prove there is over 1 mile of curve in that bridge - if you cant do it - your tolerance argument is just a weak attempt at obfuscation to agree with your biased relegion.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#2089
Dec 4 2017 05:43pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Dec 4 2017 01:42pm)
No proof they didn't account for it


Burden of proof is on him for claiming that tolerance accounts for 1 mile of curve in that bridge , wheres the proof - he has none cept empty words

Quote (Thor123422 @ Dec 4 2017 01:42pm)
All we need to prove the two perspectives are the same is an admission that our eyes see by absorbing photons, and that photons move in straight lines through a uniform medium.


Both of these have been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt.


this has nothing to do with the difference, please show how these two perspective are the exact same - you can't do it - so troll with BS excuses

This post was edited by card_sultan on Dec 4 2017 05:48pm
Member
Posts: 27,540
Joined: Nov 13 2008
Gold: 5,265.08
#2090
Dec 4 2017 05:43pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Dec 4 2017 05:39pm)
prove 2d reality is the same as 3d optical perspective - thasts right you have none - absolutely none

:rofl:


2D + 1D = 3D
Go Back To General Chat Topic List
Prev12072082092102111933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact