Partially but have watched many of that guy's vids. I already know what model he believes in
ie a FE earth with the Sun and Moon making a circuit around the circumference which ties in with your belief of the Sun being below the dome

I admit, he debates well but like all FE presented models there are loop holes in his belief

That moon question I posted above is based on one of them (the 21st eclipse vid)
How is it its own light source if the sun is a uni-directional source of light?

This post was edited by kai_jph on Aug 24 2017 05:45am

the guy in the vid, he presented a REAL LIFE PHYSICAL EXPERIMENT......he didn't use quotes, he didn't use a formula, he didn't use speculation, he didn't use theory.......he used a REAL LIFE PHYSICAL EXPERIMENT.

if you believe his experiment was wrong, then please show in detail, using a REAL LIFE PHYSICAL EXPERIMENT showing how it was wrong.

I am still waiting...

We did provide real experiments. You dismissed it as propaganda.

I am still waiting for your answer.
You made the moon statement 1st and have already dodged the question twice

This post was edited by kai_jph on Aug 24 2017 05:55am

show me again please, real life experiments, not a simulated computer generated experiment...

double post

This post was edited by kai_jph on Aug 24 2017 05:59am

See post above #2073
As I said good arguments but loops holes in his beliefs

You mentioned this...

...1st, you answer 1st and I will gibe a common real life experiment everyone uses every day

This post was edited by kai_jph on Aug 24 2017 06:02am

dodging is not answering the question that I asked first...

I asked the moon question 1st twice before that one

1st time
http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=77042390&f=27&o=10




This post was edited by kai_jph on Aug 24 2017 06:04am

where is the proof of real experiments provided that was submitted before you asked me about the moon light source question?

inb4 dodge

the moon is its own light source?

LOfuckinL

yep
I met one of these people in real life today
so stupid haha.
goes off in tangents to circle back to previous "well you cant prove"

you cant prove its flat.
that simple.