This is in your top 5 of idiotic intellectually dishonest , back peddling then trying to change the goal posts and then turn around and accuse and the person your talking to of doing what you just did posts.

That's his argument for everything

Btw still waiting on a single proof for anything that he said

it was a real winner!

i also think its hilarious that the terms "strawman" "intellectually dishonest" "back pedaling" "dodging" "moving goal posts" etc are all terms card stole when people used them against him. he tries to absorb certain insults and reflect them, its cute. just call him a name and off he goes using it blindly.

It will never come, because his ideology (and that's what this is, ideology, not fact) requires a complete suspension of disbelief to maintain.

If you are sitting in an airplane you are moving in the exact same direction on the inside of the plane, as the plane moves - you move - you are relative to the movement and direction of the plane.

Is the air in the atmosphere relative to the direction and movement of the Earth? Why can you not understand this?



just saying "relative" is not understanding what the word actually means

This post was edited by card_sultan on Feb 7 2017 03:31pm

How is it not a rainbow? It's a multi-colored band from red to blue in the shape of a bow. What criteria does it not fulfill?

Liquid and solid water actually have almost identical density and refractive index. Both are very slightly lower for ice, while both are quite a bit higher for glass. So liquid water is actually closer to glass than ice is, meaning it's actually easier to make a rainbow with liquid water than with ice.
Also, there's no such thing as "dispersion index" in the context of optics.

And yes, I did make water almost like a prism. Guess what? That's what happens in nature! Raindrops almost act like tiny little prisms.

I can

He just admitted that his previous picture is invalid lolol

maybe nasa is getting better and even he is getting tricked by pictures!