Always did. posted in #140 this thread



^this

No it does not prove FE, because as you see objects get smaller the further away you get until they meet at the convergence/ vanishing point (from the vid and how human vision works)


If we add the sun to the image above we would see the following if the sun got further away to the vanishing point at sun set

The sun however still appears approx the same size throughout the day and does not appear to get smaller the closer you get closer to sun set or night time

This post was edited by kai_jph on Sep 27 2017 07:11am

Unfair, they had go'uld tech to reach it
and refused to share their info



This post was edited by kai_jph on Sep 27 2017 07:17am

you still don't get it then... *sighs*

That image is exactly what you said earlier about the sun




You agree the image above (post #193) explains perspective and convergence but add the sun as per your own description and its now wrong (since its different to how humans view the sun)
You the one that clearly doesn't get it/ understand how your own model works

This post was edited by kai_jph on Sep 27 2017 07:45am

You'd have to be retarded to 'get' it.



What would constitute hard proof for something like radiation?

Btw did you ever read some comments or watch the debunking of your original video?

This post was edited by remco6 on Sep 27 2017 07:41am

Lizard people just some goaulds in Unases

Kind of like this fellow

Funny, considering *you* can't provide hard proof of FE.

Please. Ad hominem would be me saying what you say is wrong because you're stupid. I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying you're stupid because what you say is wrong.

You won't even provide a formula for how perspective works over a football field vs a basketball court, and that question has been unanswered by you for months. You don't get the luxury of waiting for other people to bend to your will when you can't even hold down your own end of a debate properly.