that's a blatant lie, usually you're better than this. but i understand that you're backed into one hell of a corner.

the article called out a metaphorical glass dome, and then backed it up with certain other theories that are exclusive to the sphere earth model.

there is no way around that, the article is either "all good" or "all bad" to your theory. the fact that you're incapable of admitting that and are no doubling down is pretty comical.

Still no proof? Yawn.

Firaga, if the world was flat you could corner a potential girlfriend on the edges.
But since it's round and rotates you keep feeling like you can't find what you need.

This is more proof than what this clown ever said so you win

Holyy

why is this thread at 200 pages (10 posts per page)?

This post was edited by rawwwrr on Feb 7 2017 01:04pm

you, if you can't see the truth next and need to strawman and cherry pick your blindness



I think the article is about a glass dome, all you + santara see is a pretty artist drawing of a globe, I realize your incappable of admitting your misunderstanding and seek to blame those that disagree with you, do you do this IRL too? I'm sure you do.




This is why we try to keep most Women out of Antarctica - the Science of dating.



why have you not changed you Post per page to 25? Slow computer?

The answer to your query is because everyone thinks for sure we live on a spinning ball but no one can actually prove it and rage because they cant.

Just like everyone is 100% sure space is an empty vacuum - but science tells us that 95% is some sort of dark matter or dark energy and they have no idea what it is and no one realizes the circular retardation of that logic.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Feb 7 2017 01:11pm

Because you have 10 ppp on

it is about a glass dome. and its proves a glass dome by using concepts only physically possible on a sphere earth model, and by proxy impossible on a flat earth model. the picture has literally nothing to do with it, if the picture was left out there would still be major hurdles for a flat earth model to use it as proof.

i find it funny you're doubling down, when instead you could have just admitted you google "glass dome earth" and clicked a source without reading it. claiming that you understand the source and have been fooled only by an unrelated picture is exactly why its check mate.

but by all means, keep talking, keep doubling down, you're just creating more problems for yourself.