Quote (death_knight @ Aug 8 2021 08:10am)
I don't think I could make an argument you wouldn't be bias towards. The difference between people like you and me is I am neutral with my belief because no religion can be proven while you as well as ck "know" that you are right in whatever doctrine you subscribe to. Not only do I have to make a sound argument but I have to contend with extreme bias always in your favor, frankly it's like debating with someone who is clinically delusional and when you do reference some science it's generally faulty reasoning so I have to point out how to approach my argument on top of the argument itself. There are pages upon pages of proof of that situation in this topic alone.
I've met one Christian in my life that agreed that his whole belief system could be wrong, of course he "knows" it's right but still accepts the possibility because he agrees the knowledge is above his compression. I have incredible respect for that man.
"I don't think I could make an argument you wouldn't be bias towards. "
(bias towards or against?)
(I am sure its certain any and all of your arguments contain no bias)
"The difference between people like you and me is I am neutral ..."
(blow out a big ol whistle on that one. what were you saying?.................. clinically delusional )
"I've met one Christian in my life that agreed that his whole belief system could be wrong,..."
(let me tell you a secret most people dont know. the scripture it self tells us we believe by faith. Which brings us back to "clinically delusional" you "think" your some kind of "fact" person. We all believe by faith the huge difference is i know it and you dont, hence your the one .............."clinically delusional")
(