Quote (TiStuff @ Jan 22 2024 09:40pm)
it doesnt
you understand you can just as easily be guilty of what you accuse me of
to clarify things deep time dating is based on assumption that cant be tested\observable
I can back up my claims of 1+1=2 you cannot back up your cultish pseudo-science of 1+1=3 without personal anecdotes and faulty logic. Belief requires no evidence, but facts requires proof. You speak only of unsubstantiated beliefs.
Dating anything old requires a time machine to confirm without assuming period. All the dating methods out there however can be checked vs known things (like tree rings, rocks, sediment layers, fossils, historical objects etc) and against each other to achieve fairly accurate data. Some of the methods are more accurate than others yet when we combine all of them they give us fairly accurate dates. Sure the accuracy drops off after certain number but it's not a even a question if the earth is 6000 years it's more of a question if the earth is 4.5 billion or 4.3 billion. We are way past the point. Maybe 1000 years ago you could of made an argument to an uneducated peasant but today this is laughable.
Just like 2000 years ago some people believed earth is flat in today's day and age we laugh at them and remind them with evidence to return back to reality.
So once again this is a reminder to return back to reality. Forget bible and Christian fairytales instead start thinking for yourself and use evidence/facts not beliefs and personal anecdotes.