d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > So What Does The Flat Earth Mean
Prev1176177178179180295Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 20,139
Joined: Nov 11 2008
Gold: 20.50
Feb 5 2017 10:33pm
ill ask my boy njag
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Feb 5 2017 11:54pm
Quote (Firaga @ Feb 5 2017 06:31pm)
It's simple. All this kid does is ask for proof on everything, pretty much playing skepticism card. He thinks he's descartes or something. Basically do the same to him and ask him for proof or anything he says is not credible. NOW WHERES MY PROOF


The mountains , frozen lakes that are level , rainbows, gyroscopes, perspective, crepuscular ray, selenelion eclipses, laser level tests, profession planar surveyors, bridges and Canals that never need to account for curve, submarines, pilots, tunnel construction, captain, engineers , scientist's who understand geocentric experiments- the proof is so great you need to be blind to not see it, or perhaps to dumb to understand it.

Which is probably very likely since you have no proof of Earth's rotundity except a picture from Nasa that is fake and a bunch of medieval myths that are easily debunked and pure rage if anyone dares notice its all BS.

Heres another proof for you, but you probably will not even watch it or educate yourself - preferring to complain about women who won't sleep with you.



Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 5 2017 06:28pm)
When I asked why you can't see Polaris from the southern hemisphere he tasked me with taking a picture of the sky from every city in the southern hemisphere. Troll or retard, it doesn't matter. No need to take tard sultan seriously


I heard that you can see it in cities up to 20 degrees south of the equator - which you should not be able to in Ball Earth theory - and this idea that you should be able to see the entire sky at night if the earth is flat is just as wrong as thinking you should see the Sun all the time, you only see a section of the sky, its really not that hard to understand.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Feb 6 2017 12:06am
Member
Posts: 86,546
Joined: May 13 2009
Gold: 1,000.69
Feb 6 2017 12:01am
Quote (card_sultan @ Feb 6 2017 12:54am)
The mountains , frozen lakes that are level , rainbows, gyroscopes, perspective, crepuscular ray, selenelion eclipses, laser level tests, profession planar surveyors, bridges and Canals that never need to account for curve, submarines, pilots, tunnel construction, captain, engineers , scientist's who understand geocentric experiments- the proof is so great you need to be blind to not see it, or perhaps to dumb to understand it.

Which is probably very likely since you have no proof of Earth's rotundity except a picture from Nasa that is fake and a bunch of medieval myths that are easily debunked and pure rage if anyone dares notice its all BS.

Heres another proof for you, but you probably will not even watch it or educate yourself - preferring to complain about women who won't sleep with you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWakrkYzPVY


proof that this video is not photoshopped or altered in any way? proof that mountains are real? proof that rainbows are real? proof that women won't sleep with me? WHERE MY PROOFS AT DOE
Member
Posts: 37,595
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 311.74
Feb 6 2017 12:04am
Quote (Firaga @ Feb 6 2017 06:01am)
proof that this video is not photoshopped or altered in any way? proof that mountains are real? proof that rainbows are real? proof that women won't sleep with me? WHERE MY PROOFS AT DOE


When... will fiagra get his proofs
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Feb 6 2017 12:09am
Quote (Firaga @ Feb 5 2017 08:01pm)
proof that this video is not photoshopped or altered in any way? proof that mountains are real? proof that rainbows are real? proof that women won't sleep with me? WHERE MY PROOFS AT DOE


Proof you even watched the video? - cause he does show various proof in it - , wow now i know why so many people say your retarded.

Perhaps you can specifically restate his argument and theory and show what part of that video was photoshopped to change results - and do you have proof that that type of evidence can be photoshopped?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Feb 6 2017 12:14am
Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Feb 6 2017 12:15am
Card sultan has much lower standards for "proof" when it agrees with his nonsense ideals.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Feb 6 2017 12:46am
Quote (Plaguefear @ Feb 5 2017 08:15pm)
Card sultan has much lower standards for "proof" when it agrees with his nonsense ideals.


not true at all, i dont want to believe the Earth is flat - because to do so you need to admit to yourself how easily you were fooled by popular opinion and realize the decades of pure propaganda you received and why it is for pure social reasons we all believe the Earth is a ball.

Look at how angry people get when you discuss this. People dont like Flat Earth because they cant handle the truth. Popular opinion is for the young and their foolish immature testosterone fueled egos.

Id ask you to offer an example where you explain how one proof is more logical than another but I know this task is beyond your capability.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Feb 6 2017 12:51am
Member
Posts: 20,253
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,267.97
Feb 6 2017 02:09am
Quote (card_sultan @ Feb 6 2017 12:34am)
Planets are called the wondering stars - even helio science calls this a gas giant - wether it has a something solid on the inside is debateable

It is also beyond the plasmashpere dome of the Earth plane - so perhaps it is the plasmasphere of that plane or dimension. One way to think of the dome is that you can see out, but you cant see in.

In Geocentricity, Stars are not balls of burning gas billions of light years away - they are within the dome and sort of a point of static EM energy.

exactly what they are , no one knows cause no one has ever been to one.

but here's what they look like: certainly not a ball of burning gas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mWeYZhILFI


Do you mean to say that the planets are behind the stars?

I remember you saying that the stars are part of the dome -- that's correct, right?

So, if a star were to align with a planet from our point of view, would be see the star in front of the planet?
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Feb 6 2017 03:14am
Quote (Leevee @ Feb 5 2017 10:09pm)
Do you mean to say that the planets are behind the stars?

I remember you saying that the stars are part of the dome -- that's correct, right?

So, if a star were to align with a planet from our point of view, would be see the star in front of the planet?


what some call "planets" - they call wandering stars, they are different from normal stars

the stars are normally part of the dome but i dont know if every star is part of the dome

i heard some people say that you can see a star though the moon sometimes, it might happen with the wandering stars too
Member
Posts: 20,253
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,267.97
Feb 6 2017 09:15am
Quote (card_sultan @ Feb 6 2017 11:14am)
what some call "planets" - they call wandering stars, they are different from normal stars

the stars are normally part of the dome but i dont know if every star is part of the dome

i heard some people say that you can see a star though the moon sometimes, it might happen with the wandering stars too


So if a star, that's part of the dome, were to align with Saturn, we'd see that star in front of Saturn?
Go Back To General Chat Topic List
Prev1176177178179180295Next
Closed New Topic New Poll