you're argument has no weight and is just typical logical fallacy



you can see fire but it doesn't create a shadow

and you simply have no idea whether an object you cant see casts a shadow

you have a hard time between stating an excuse and thinking it means you have crushed and whether or not that excuse you choose to type out in letters has any validity. While you may have stated an excuse - I can assure you that excuse had no validity.

As for your solar eclipse excuse, that its just line of sight, its just more typical fallacy because we can see at night from the reflected light on the moon - and since the earth is more reflective than the moon - the moon should be light up with Earthshine - enough so that we should be able to make it out but no one can.

And in your example you could still see it was a girl - not just a round object of indeterminate identification - and a result setting the camera for exposure of the light, not for setting exposure for the shadow while even if exposure is set for what you think is the moon during an eclipse - no image of the moon can be made.


This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 28 2017 08:27pm

LOL

really

LOL

that moment when someone has no comeback at all, so they just post "LOL" like it means something productive to the discussion...

discussion? This crap was over at the first post lols

wuzezpk.

that moment when you claim "laughing" at YT proof , followed by posting YT proof

priceless irony






must be hard to admit no one can prove the spinning ball rocket & space balls model






This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 28 2017 11:50pm

You shine 1000 candle lights at 1 candle light and cry when you can't see the 1.

Yeah this thread turned into a laughing running joke at cards expense.

Awesome! That right there proves the earth is a cube