d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Globe Earth
Prev11601611621631641933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
Nov 26 2017 01:32pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 26 2017 09:29pm)
Ok i just d/l that image from NASa and Gamma corrected it to examine it

this is what you get - 100% fake

https://i.imgur.com/fVCE5oC.jpg

:rofl:

this is why none of the real ball trollers use nasa as a source anymore - cause they know its a dead end




:rofl:


But its from NASA which you sited. So NASA is not a reliable source then correct?

You have claimed countless times of NASA covering things up indoctrinating us to the GE model
So now they have released info "that the earth is flat" so where is their documented research and evidence to this

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19940002492
Heres an updated version of the "The Derivation and Definition of a Linear Model program"
where they describe in detail what they mean.

The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations with stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth assumptions

This post was edited by kai_jph on Nov 26 2017 01:42pm
Member
Posts: 86,546
Joined: May 13 2009
Gold: 1,000.69
Nov 26 2017 01:37pm
Quote (kai_jph @ Nov 26 2017 02:32pm)
So NASA is not a reliable source then correct?



Classic example of flat earthers ignoring anything that doesnt fit their hypothesis and only considering those that fit. This has mothing to do with NASA’s name. Classic hypocrisy and ignorance :rofl:
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
Nov 26 2017 01:37pm
Quote (kai_jph @ Nov 26 2017 11:32am)
So NASA is not a reliable source then correct?


Only when he wants it to be :rofl:
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 26 2017 01:39pm
Quote (kai_jph @ Nov 26 2017 09:32am)
So NASA is not a reliable source then correct?


I wouldn't blindly trust their images but its not as clear as either Black or White - as you think

Sometimes they lie, sometimes they dont know, sometimes the tell the truth

you seem to have this impression that people are either all good or all bad - its like youve been watching cartoon characters and scripts for too long.



Quote (Firaga @ Nov 26 2017 09:37am)
Classic example of flat earthers ignoring anything that doesnt fit their hypothesis and only considering those that fit. This has mothing to do with NASA’s name. Classic hypocrisy and ignorance :rofl:


classic hypocrisy and ignorance is thinking a picture from NASA is 100% reality even when you're shown it fake

:rofl:

This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 26 2017 01:42pm
Member
Posts: 86,546
Joined: May 13 2009
Gold: 1,000.69
Nov 26 2017 01:40pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 26 2017 02:39pm)
I wouldn't blindly trust their images but its not as clear as either Black or White - as you think

Sometimes they lie, sometimes they dont know, sometimes the tell the truth

you seem to have this impression that people are either all good or all bad - its like youve been watching cartoon characters and scripts for too long.


Quote (JohnMiller92 @ Nov 26 2017 02:37pm)
Only when he wants it to be :rofl:


Quote (Firaga @ Nov 26 2017 02:37pm)
Classic example of flat earthers ignoring anything that doesnt fit their hypothesis and only considering those that fit. This has mothing to do with NASA’s name. Classic hypocrisy and ignorance :rofl:


Bump
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
Nov 26 2017 01:44pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 26 2017 09:39pm)
I wouldn't blindly trust their images but its not as clear as either Black or White - as you think

Sometimes they lie, sometimes they dont know, sometimes the tell the truth

you seem to have this impression that people are either all good or all bad - its like youve been watching cartoon characters and scripts for too long.


So now they may be right.

You have claimed countless times of NASA covering things up indoctrinating us to the GE model
So now they have released info "that the earth is flat" so where is their documented research and evidence to this

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19940002492
Heres an updated version of the "The Derivation and Definition of a Linear Model program"
where they describe in detail what they mean.

The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations with stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth assumptions

This post was edited by kai_jph on Nov 26 2017 01:46pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 26 2017 01:49pm
Quote (Firaga @ Nov 26 2017 09:40am)
Bump


classic example of the hypocrisy of Balls is space theory ignoring Nasa evidence that proves fake while also ignoring evidence that Nasa says because it doesn't fit into their bias

while still claiming Nasa is a solid source > YT videos

:rofl:
Member
Posts: 15,032
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 3.37
Nov 26 2017 01:53pm
Member
Posts: 45,099
Joined: Oct 23 2007
Gold: 2,333.71
Warn: 40%
Nov 26 2017 01:53pm
Dat booty
Member
Posts: 86,546
Joined: May 13 2009
Gold: 1,000.69
Nov 26 2017 01:57pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 26 2017 02:49pm)
classic example of the hypocrisy of Balls is space theory ignoring Nasa evidence that proves fake while also ignoring evidence that Nasa says because it doesn't fit into their bias

while still claiming Nasa is a solid source > YT videos

:rofl:



So NASA is no longer a solid source? You have to pick one or the other. No exceptions.
Go Back To General Chat Topic List
Prev11601611621631641933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll