i dont eat sushi anyway
its against my religion
lets do some interpretation
Let's say I point to some sushi and tell you cannot eat these sushi no matter what or I punish you. Then I turn around and say have these mouth watering sushi because I command you. What do you choose?
here addone appoints himself as an authority figure.
Id choose not to eat because there are consequences
plays along
i dont eat sushi anyway
its against my religion
nirjan rejects his authority
Ah yes very good. Now you get punished
false equivocation fallacy