How to tell, in online spaces, state-sponsored disinfo artists, aka Jew-sponsored disinfo artists, aka feds. They all amount to the same thing.

Here I would like to talk about the various ways these feds/disinfo artists operate, so that the good people will have a way to defend themselves against the government's lies, in the event that I get murdered by Jews, a very real possibility.

OK, here we go. They (the feds, disinfo arists..etc) will of course, try to make you think that they are one of you. That they are of like mind. They will talk about things that they know will appeal to you. This is Political Infiltration 101, you know, standard stuff. Any freedom-fighter worth his salt should know this by now. Now, I want to talk about the more advanced techniques. They will, say, act revolutionary enough by talking some forbidden topics, such as conspiracies. It can be of any kind, but it's all things that normal people dare not talk about, and only a certain type of people online talk about, aka the freedom-fighters, the free-thinkers, the dissenters, people who actually see what's going on the world and especially what governments are trying to do. Anyway. The feds/disinfo artists will discuss earnestly amongst themselves (they always work as a team, individually these feds are no match for the good people, and they know this). They might occasionally throw out some gems that possess a certain level of insight, designed to fool the inexperienced into thinking they are the real deal. I will give an example of what I mean by "gems of a certain level of insight. Remember that fake "White Nationalist" Yggdrasil, back in the heyday of Stormfront? I remember that he said that work is social control. And how to determine whether a piece of writing has true value, you do so by judging whether it has predictive as well as explanatory power. Pretty impressive stuff, very good insight, right? Well, to the mediocre mind. That fake poster said those things to give off the impression that he was real, when in fact, he only gave away enough insight to establish himself as one whose wisdom is to be respected. The insight, though valuable, did not really aid White Nationalism in any meaningful way. This is what I mean by the feds/disinfo artists throwing out enough insight to lure you in, but not enough to actually aid your cause in any meaningful way.

Now, there is this thing called mirroring, where they copy and reflect back the things you said and the things you believe in. Now, I used to think that this was a very good way to determine that someone was a fed/disinfo artist. But now, I must modify my position. You should look at someone who is mirroring you, whether he's doing it out of malicious intention (as in, he's trying to fool you into thinking he's one of you), or if he's just a normal person copying you because he admires your style. I used to be very scared and paranoid when I saw mirroring behaviors in what I thought were good/safe spaces. It really scared me quite a bit. But now I realize it's just humans being human. They imitate that which is worth imitating. In other words, not all that mirror you, are feds. Some are, some aren't. So gather more information and then use your judgment.

They key thing, and it's in fact also the easiest thing, to figure out whether who you're dealing with is the real deal or not, is by looking at whether what they say: 1. actually damages the Power That Be/the Deep State in a real, meaningful way. This can be done in a number of ways. My personal favorite is to see if they can either see through the intent of the government/the Powers that be/the Deep state. And not only that, to also share that insight in a way that a lot of people can see it. It is no use if someone says really damaging stuff, but in totally obscure, uninfluential corners of the internet. Another favorite I have, is whether they can accurately anticipate the moves of hardcore feds such as the CIA or the FBI. Again, they also have to be sharing this insight in prominent web-spaces, otherwise, there is still a chance that they are fake.

I used to base it on whether they talk about Jews openly (this is also known as, Naming the Jew). This used to work 20+ years ago, but not anymore. "The Jew" is now old news. Besides, when we talk about Jews in the collective like that, it gives off major genocidal vibe. Very, very few normal people do that. So, when someone does not talk about "the Jews", I no longer immediately write him off as a fed. He could just be a normal person with a conscience. So, instead, I modify my rule a bit: it is bad to talk about Jews like that. You know, as a group, a collective. However, if someone correctly points out that even though not all Jews are evil, the ones who are evil, tend to be overwhelmingly Jewish. When I hear something like this, I know I am dealing with someone who is potentially the real deal.

A few more things I have observed: Feds/disinfo artists will sometimes give what sounds like helpful advice, but what it actually does is it diverts you, your attention, money, resources...etc, from the cause and into something that is not that important. For example, the fake poster Yggdrail again. He recommended that people donate money to some institution researching the Holocaust, to see whether there was any inconsistency or falsehood or whatever. You know, stuff that would appeal to the ears of a White Nationalist. On the surface, this sounds like helpful advice. However, giving money to a research institution will produce results very slowly, due to the slow nature of research. This fake poster did this so that people's money would be diverted from what would have made a real impact at the time, AKA, money being donated to the then Stormfront. Today I still see this. The conspiracy thing, where feds pretend to discuss forbidden truths with gusto. You will notice the topic is always something that's not consequential at all, even if you manage to get to the bottom of things. Two examples I can think of off the top of my head: that Brigitte Macron is actually a man; and that the JFK assassination was actually fake. These are both technically conspiracy theories, however, they are absolutely inconsequential. And feds talk about them in the hope that you will join in on the conversation, and waste your very valuable time. It's a diversionary tactic.

(Continued)

(Continues)

Another tell-tale sign is that they use an overtly white/WASP/Germanic name. (The stuff that follows all happened on a forum, the name of which I will provide at the end). So basically, It's like they cannot wait to tell you he's a white guy. There is a guy by the name of georgephilips, or some such, basically something that is so painfully obvious, that you actually cringe a bit for them. They also like to curse Jews out, seemingly enthusiastically, but when you start asking probing questions, and by probing questions, I mean questions that, when properly answered, will deal a huge blow to Jews. This is when their behavior will go from Jew-bashing, to Jew-defending. Yet another tactic: when you ask a really "good" question, as in, a question that you just know deserves an answer. Yet they go completely silent. This is another sign that it's a fed/Jew. Then, there is always the inconsistency. I remember talking to some pretend-white guy who was bashing the "Zionist Jews" wildly. When I said to him that he was trying hard to make a distinction between Jews and "Zionist Jews" in an attempt to save Jews from whatever's coming to them, he immediately changed his vocabulary. So now, instead of the "Zionist Jews" which he supposedly hates so much, it is now just "Jews". This is inconsistency. Furthermore, it also suggests to me that this individual is trying to impress me. This is extremely telling. It not only warned me about this poster, it also made me start to wonder about the credibility of the entire forum that we were talking on.

Then, there was this dude, oh trust me, he said all the right things. He went by the user name of Donald H. All of a sudden, he appeared in a lot of threads I was in. Up until that point, I was totally unaware of him, never talked to him before. It was just very strange. He was hinting about how he knew about the "underground movement" or some such, which is known as a bait. He was trying to lure me into meeting him and his "underground freedom-fighter" friends, so that he could all like, 'I am gonna take you to go meet my fake revolutionary friends. It's super top-secret, so you would have to tell nobody else about it. Absolutely no one, OK? This is so that no one will know that you have gone missing. And then, come with me alone to some woods, where I will murder you then bury you there". They do this to troublemakers, dissenters, people who go against governments, and people who are just plain dangerous. But the biggest tip-off about this fake poster, was that he was talking to another poster (whose user name was shockedcanadian) who I knew with 95% certainty to be a fed. He (the former) was saying how the fed lost his house in a divorce case and how it was because of his deviant behaviors. You know, something antagonistic that might make you think he was an enemy of the fed. But really, when you think about it critically, you will realize that people who are true enemies of each other aren't supposed to know such intimate details about the personal life of the other person. And this is when it dawned on me: This poster is fake, too. It really isn't that hard to figure out what's real and what's fake, all you need to do is employ critical thinking (more on this later).

Another thing: They give responses that you aren't expecting/don't make sense. For example, I was talking to one poster who pretended to be one of the good people who are watching me online. When I offered to give him an account of why I did what I did, he said no, much to my surprise. I was surprised because I had always thought they wanted an answer. So now, here I am, offering him the opportunity to learn about me, and he's actually turning me down? At first it was perplexing. But now it starts to make sense. He did not want me to reveal more about me to the people on the other side because it would make them like me even more. And they know they cannot let that happen. So, this fake poster turned me down, and this manifests itself as behavior that one does not expect, a response that does not make sense. Again, a tip-off.

There was yet another pretend-white guy (sometimes I really think there are more fake white guys than real white guys on the internet). He said all the right things. I mean, when someone showed a picture of Israeli atrocities, he said that after he saw that picture, he couldn't sleep that night. I mean, so far so good, right? Here is what must be a real white guy, I mean he has a conscience and is bothered by Israel's atrocities. Surely he cannot be a fed/Jew? So, naturally, I was encouraged. I shared more stuff that comes out of Israel. Like, really, really nasty stuff. His response? "Trust you? Lol I don't think so". Or something to that effect. I mean, I am not saying that he has to believe me, but what he should have done, is to do some research himself, to see if those horrible things that I am alleging that Israel does, are true or not. Because atrocities like that are incredibly serious, if true. Anybody with a working conscience should be motivated to do some research. This is the proper response of a normal person with a normal conscience. But look at this fed trying hard to discredit me. By calling my credibility into question. This tells me that his true goal is to safeguard Israel's reputation. He does not want more Israel wrongdoings to come to light. Therefore, all that tears over Israeli atrocities are just fake-ass, crocodile tears shed to lure in the unwary. By the way, this fed's, who is also likely a Jew, behavior actually reinforces in me that Jews will defend the behavior of a fellow Jew, no matter how immoral it is. It seems that in Jews' quest for survival, the ability to be offended by the immoral behavior of another Jew, has been permanently bred out of the Jewish gene pool. So yea, a simple, 6-word dismissive response from a crypto-online-Jew made me realize two heavy-hitting truths in one shot. Sometimes you really have to wonder just how badly Jews can fail.

Also: Feds have no problem denying things that there is actually hard evidence for. For example, this poster, who is very likely a fed (his username is Missourian) said to me that he knew me. But, in another post, he totally denied knowing me. I mean, it's one thing to deny things, but to deny things that there is actually evidence for??? Honestly, this is the kind of rank dishonesty that only feds are capable of.

Also, another tell-tale sign that you are on a fake site, which is pretty much all of them, is that your good stuff gets no response. You know what I mean, when you say something that you know is good, is valuable, is worthwhile, and you know it deserves some sort of response but didn't, then that's when you know you are on a containment site set up by the feds. They are deathly afraid that what you say might be seen, in fact they cannot wait for your thread to sink down to the bottom of the page. The last thing they want is to say something to you, because it would bump your stuff for the world to see. Also, general advice to the good people is to look up mind games. See what's involved, what they do, what they can do, what techniques they use, to play mind-games and manipulate others. Jews are masters at mind-games. Anyway, Jews love to play mind-games, so study these so as to defend oneself. Lastly, a word about critical thinking. Critical thinking is not just used in the political arena, it can be used pretty much everywhere else. For example, on this astrology forum that I used to go to, people would post the horoscope charts of people they knew and talk about what they were like, etc. Now, you need very detailed birth info of someone, in order to cast a proper chart. A lot of people were talking about the horoscope charts of their supposed enemies at work or school. Which puzzled me. I can understand if one can find the birth info of one's friends, or lover or family, but how does one get that info (which is incredibly detailed, for the kind that is required to cast a chart) from one's enemy? I did not understand how it could have worked, and so I wondered out loud. The result? People realized how improbable their ability to obtain intimate details of enemies was, and they stopped posting the charts of people they hated. This is the moment I started to realize that the forum might be fake. Again, this is critical thinking at work.

Anyway, to prove that I am not lying about any of the stuff, the site where all this happened, is https://www.usmessageboard.com/. My account name is MayorQuimby. Feel free to go through my posts there, so you know that I am not lying. By the way, you also know what this means, right? This means this website will very soon disappear off the net, for some unknown reason. They don't want the world to see evidence for the many despicable things that they do.

I believe that there exist out there a few former CIA and FBI agents, who resigned their rather enviable posts, due to their disillusionment with the organization. Which is very understandable, when you are a normal person with a normal, working conscience, you go into an agency like the CIA, you think that you are serving your country and the people. You think you are working for the force of Good. But then, you see what they actually do. Lying, deceiving, tricking, denying, stonewalling, evading when questioned by proper authority, obstructing the justice process, cheating, entrapping, setting people up, making veiled threats that are not legally punishable...to name just a few of many, many, many things that they have zero problem doing. This is when you start to realize, that maybe They, are not what They seem. And people, I say that we should reach out to these disillusioned, former federal agents. Ask them what they know about the organization, what made them realize that it was a mistake, and what made them go from full of high hopes, to a state of complete disillusionment. I believe these individuals might be of help to us, in gaining insight into these Viper Pits. We might even be able to bring some of them into the fold, I mean, they have a working conscience. That alone should make our movement incredibly attractive to them.

One major tactic Jews worked out to survive and pass on their genes is wealth accumulation. Jews are very good at making and amassing money, this is well-known. They do this because women sometimes go for money in a man, despite his ugly looks. But this is not an ideal situation. Normally and ideally, a man should use his good personal qualities to attract women, such as good looks, good personality, talents, intelligence or a noble character. When a man needs to wave a wad of cash in a woman's face, there is a very good chance that he has nothing else going for him. Have you heard of, "Money is the great equalizer"? I bet it was a Jew who said this. This is the battle-cry of the beta male. They use wealth as their crutch to attract women, which is sad, pathetic and offensive, however it very often works.

@@@@

One thing Jews like to do: I have found that when white people do something that Jews want them to do less of, they (Jews) really like to say, "That's a little sad" in order to shame white people out of that behavior. For example, Jews have a natural desire to mate with white people. Whenever they encounter attitudes that prevent them from marrying and breeding with white people, such as a Christian clergyman who refuses to bless the marriage between a Christian and a Jew, they will say, "That's a little sad when you think about it". And of course, some weak-minded white people fall for it. And then their behavior changes. Now they will marry and mate with jews. This is one way how Jews manipulate white people's behavior.

@@@@

Difference between white people and Jews: Jews will only do something nice for you if they have assurance that you will do something nice for them in return. The way Jews approach inter-personal relationships is strictly transactional. When a Jew does something nice, it's not because they have kind, beneficent feelings for you. It's because they have calculated that there is something in it for themselves, or that they have determined that not doing this nice thing will be worse for them than doing it. The concept of doing things out of the goodness of one's heart is foreign to Jews. Also, after Jews did something nasty to you, and then try to make it up to you, don't delude yourself into thinking they are genuinely sorry for what they did. They are only saying sorry so as to prevent retaliation. They don't want you to seek revenge against them, so they try to placate you by saying they are sorry or otherwise doing something kind for you. Don't fall for it. They are only doing this to make things easier for themselves.

@@@@

People will always treat blond-haired people more tenderly and black haired ones more harshly. It's human nature. Humans treat better-looking people better. Now, Jews can scream all they want about how this is not right, and how this is racist, but it won't stop people from treating blonds better. What Jews are really mad at is mother nature for making themselves black-haired and as a result, not cherished. but instead of being mad at nature Jews get mad at white people.

@@@@

I mean, I can understand if someone doesn't believe in the Christian God; they think virgin birth is impossible, and so on. I can understand that. But to go against Christianity, which teaches people to be good, that is on a whole other level. I mean, how evil does one have to be, to be actively against Christianity and Christians? My rhetorical question is meant to make you think, especially about Jews, who hate Christians so much, as evidenced by all the various policies put forth by all the governments in the West that they control, and the various covertly hateful, Christian-bashing messages sent out by the media that they control. I want you to find out, for yourselves, the mechanism that could have caused a people, not just a few psychopathic individuals, but an entire race of people, to have such insane levels of hate, for people who are essentially kind, nice people, AKA Christians.

@@@@

Regarding why Jews want white people gone so badly: I believe it goes beyond a simple hatred for white people. Jews covet white people's blond hair. So they try hard to get their hands on blonds and blondes, in some cases marrying them, and in all cases, procreating with them. This is so that they will get the coveted blond hair in their descendants. but, something about this frustrates Jews. They know that in doing so, they are essentially helping white people spread their genes. Jews hate this. So, they came up with something: they will continue to marry and reproduce with white people, and to prevent this from benefitting white people, they (Jews) will do their best to destroy white people and their genes. Jews hate that they would be helping white people genetically by acting on their desire. They hate even more that they themselves want to be blond.

Some might wonder why Jews are so different from white people. Well, we need to realize that Jews and white people evolved under very different conditions. White people's ancestors evolved on Mount Caucasus, which was a very harsh physical environment. Jews' ancestors, on the other hand, evolved as a group living among white people, whom they had to struggled hard against. People who evolved having to deal with harsh environment tend to develop a lot of positive traits, such as good looks, likable personality, noble character...things that attract others to them. White people are in this category. People who evolved having to struggle against other humans tend to have a lot of negative traits, such as ugly physical looks, unlikable personality, despicable character, behaviors that literally cause harm to others. And Jews belong to the second category.

@@@@

Jews always have an excuse for the unreasonable things they do, and the unreasonable laws that they pass. For example, signing up for cryptocurrency trading online. They require government-issued IDs, documents that show your personal address (it can't be a business address or a PO box). Ostensibly they say this is to prevent money laundering, when in fact the real reason is they want to oust those who have been sending financial support to organizations that are critical of Jews or the government. In other words, the Jew-infested behemoth that you call your government, wants to find out who's been supporting sites like http://Gab.com, which threatens it. Or consider the site Craigslist. There used to be a section for the opposite sexes to find one another. Eventually they claimed the government told them to shut down this section, and the overt reason was that there were concerns about human trafficking. Don't be fooled, this is just a pretext for them to take down yet another way for white people to meet romantic partners. This is so that there will be yet fewer white babies being born. My point is, Jews ALWAYS have an excuse. Yet most of us don't question it whatsoever, and we just roll with these changes, putting up no resistance. We just think, "oh, the government wants us to do this. The government must have really good reasons, and we mustn't doubt them or their intentions. They either are trying to protect us or to prevent crimes". No. You need to get this dangerous idea out of your head. Government does not always mean well.

@@@@

What Jews do to people who cross them: If you have children, Jews will threaten you with their lives. And if you all have is a little dog, Jews will threaten you with its life, too. So do not reveal who is dear to your heart because Jews would certainly threaten you with their life. Conversely, if you want to kill someone without getting your hands dirty, convince Jews that this person means the world to you. then the natural Jewish behavior will take care of him for you.

@@@@

Jews will only do something nice for you if they can extract a promise from you that you will do something nice in return. Compare to white people, who do nice things because it pleases them to do so. In other words, white people do nice things out of the goodness of their hearts. This is a completely foreign concept to Jews.

@@@@

One thing I have noticed about Hollywood Jews: they like to "flip" things on their heads. By that I mean, to write scripts that go against what the usual tropes. A few examples: the woman proposing to the man instead of the other way around. In the TV show Friends, Monica was seen as proposing to her lover Chandler. This commercial where a woman slides across the hood of her car to escape the father of the man she just seduced, when normally, it's the guy who would seduce the girl and then run away from her father. And the man she just seduced was shown as looking at her longingly. Normally it's the other way around. In the TV show House, a female doctor was shown as acting distant to a male doctor she just had some casual sex with. The male doctor was seen as really keen to have a real, meaningful relationship with her after the sex. Or consider the TV show "Malcolm in the Middle". There was a German man who ran a farm. He wanted his son to go into the family business, but he refused, and went into medicine, something much more prestigious. The German man disowned the son, and was shown as ripping up the letters the son wrote home. And things like Michael Jackson's hit songs "Bad" and "Smooth criminal", which go against the usual societal expectations of how people should behave. There could be many more. So basically, Jews like to go for a complete reversal of what usually happens. These Hollywood Jews probably consider themselves very talented now.

Jews have evolved to see all non-Jews as cattle, who deserves exploitation, contempt, and in some cases, even outright abuse. This can be seen in the way the Jews in Hollywood portray the various minorities in their shows and movies. Another way this manifests itself, is the way Israelis, who are essentially Jews, treat the Palestinians. In fact, don't take my word for it. Observe the behavior of a Jew/Jews, towards anyone who is not a Jew. There are so many examples, I don't need to list them, and It's not hard at all for you to find at all.

@@@@

I genuinely believe that kindness and compassion have been bred out of the Jewish gene pool. I say this because of what I have observed about Jews and what they do. Again, look for examples wherever you can. I am not making stuff up, nor am I saying things out of hatred for Jews. I say what I say, because it really is the truth.

@@@@

Christianity is the weapon good people use, in their struggle against bad people. For it calls on the good, the righteous, to band together, love one another, help out one another, and wherever possible, to stamp out Evil. Perhaps this is the reason Jews hate Christianity, Christians, and Christ so much?

Personally, I have been on the receiving end of Christian kindness and generosity. They give me water when I am thirsty. They give me food when I am hungry. They talk to me like I have worth, they tell me I have worth. In fact, I am someone who uses soup kitchens a lot, and the vast, vast majority of them are operated by Christians. They also give out stuff, too, like socks, mittens...etc. And these people literally take money from out of their own pockets, to give to strangers who they (the Christians) are un-related to. This, to me, is absolutely amazing. And it's one major reason why I have so much respect and admiration for Christians. Which, by the way, begs the question I asked elsewhere on Gab. Why would a race of people, namely Jews, hate such kind, helpful, nice people, such as most Christians? The only reason I can think of, is that Jews are literally wicked. I don't say this out of hate, but rather, I say it as an honest answer that I have arrived upon, after much consideration.

@@@@

Someone I talked to mentioned that Jesus was too spiritual for Jews. We need to realize that Jews of Jesus's days, much like present-day Jews, were very anti-spiritual, and highly materialistic. They are very focused on worldly pleasures. They were expecting a kingdom that was earthly. Jesus's talk of the Kingdom of God was too spiritual for them. They wanted a military leader (the technical name for this, is Messiah), someone who would free them from foreign rule and give them prosperity, which really just means money. I mean I understand how much it must have sucked to be under foreign rule, and it was normal to want to be free. However we should not overlook Jews' materialistic, un-spiritual nature. It doesn't really matter the mechanism by which they became that way. The important thing is that, they are that way, and Jews have devastating, extremely harmful impact on the white people they live among. Please study the policies of Western governments for the past 8 decades or so. Jews, after they won WW2 against Germany, have been getting and consolidating power in the West. And now, they are in all the governments in the West. Don't believe me? Look at any law or policy that came out during the past couple decades. Almost all of them harm white people in some way.

@@@@

Jews ingeniously worked out a way to make up for their inferiority, which is banding together for shady purposes. One way this plays out is Jews giving preferential treatments to one another. There is actually a modern-day manifestation of this. A lot of prestigious awards are basically Jews' way of promoting the reproductive fitness of their own group. They preferentially give awards to one another. Einstein is one very salient example. Jews talk him up excessively, all the time and everywhere, because they want white women to think that Jews are a smart, desirable race, that the Jewish man is a good romantic partner who possesses good genes. This is one way Jews' ancestors worked out to increase their fitness.

This post was edited by JessiWan on Oct 21 2025 10:41pm

What is to blame for the increase in mass shootings in recent years? I think deteriorating mental health is definitely a part of it, but I think the Jew-controlled media is the biggest contributor. And by that I don't mean the constant, needless violence they show on TV and in movies, but rather, I mean the reporting that they do on various mass-shootings. They say that they are just reporting news-worthy stories, which is technically true, however, their true motive is to subtly put this idea in susceptible people (usually mentally unstable, armed young white males)'s minds to shoot up a school/mall...etc. This is so that they will have more ammunition to use when they want to drum up the public's support for their gun-grabbing agenda---"Look at all these mass-shootings!! Aren't they awful!! Isn't it time we started talking about gun-control!!!" It's the same tactic that they used, when they reported all those teenaged girls suffering from eating disorders. Notice how they always used white girls when reporting these stories, and it's because they wanted to subtly put the idea in impressionable young white girls' minds that this is the disorder that white girls get. And once thus subliminally influenced, white girls start to get all kinds of eating disorders. This is a very dirty trick the Jews use.

Btw, the reason Jews want white girls to get eating disorders is so that they will become incredibly thin. A really thin woman cannot ovulate, which causes her to not be able to have babies. And Jews love nothing more than white women who cannot have babies.

@@@@

Trust me, Jews things that are so insanely bad, it's actually a bit unbelievable to normal people. I remember reading this article in a major English-language scientific journal, I think it was either Scientific American, or something else. This was from about 20 to 25 years ago. It was a major English-speaking magazine on scientific stuff, though it wasn't very technical, it was meant for the masses. I personally don't have a paper copy of this magazine, but I am sure that if we put the word out, there must be someone out there who still possess a physical copy, which can then be used to corroborate my allegation. Anyway, the article bore an unmistakably Israeli university's name, and in it the scientists described their findings of what would happen to an animal's brain after it was exposed to pain repeatedly till it died. The finding was that the brain had become enlarged. In case the language I used is too sterile, essentially what they did was they tortured an animal to literal death, to study what pain would do to its brain. And I said Jews instead of Israelis, because these weren't IDF soldiers or people from the Israeli government. They were university scholars, in other words civilians. If civilian Jews would do something as unbelievably cruel like this, can you imagine what Jews in the armed forces would do?

@@@@

Jews lust after white women and have no problem using money and abusing the power that they have in large amounts of, to pressure white women into having sex with them. Have you guys heard of the term, "casting couch principle"? Basically, before it was outlawed, casting directors in Hollywood, who were overwhelmingly Jewish men, would pressure white female starlets to sleep with them, so that they could get starring roles in big-budget films. In fact, Virginia Guiffre, who was told by Epstein, to have sex with Dershowitz, who is Jewish, 6 times. There was another Jewish man that I can't recall at the moment, but I am sure if people look, they will find. By the way, all those cryptic comments were made by Virgina Guiffre online, were very probably real and made by her. I believe that she made them while under tremendous psychological distress, brought on by the very same people who wanted her dead but wanted to make it look like a suicide.

By the way, regarding the phenomenon known as "casting couch principle" I don't think it matters who invented it, but I know that Jewish casting directors abused their power a lot to force white female starlets to sleep with them, who otherwise wouldn't have. They had to outlaw it because it was so bad. It's similar to the plausible deniability thing that the CIA loves so much. Someone was once telling me how the CIA didn't invent it, and I told him it didn't matter. The important thing is that the CIA loves that shit.

Another thing: I always knew Epstein was murdered, because the security camera was turned off. I don't know what the normal protocol would be, but it just strikes me as odd that for an inmate like him, security camera really should be on all the time, because of high risk of suicide. And then the guards also conveniently walked off or weren't paying attention or whatever, which again, is probable but not highly likely. When you put these two suspicious things together, plus the fact Epstein could have seriously gotten a lot of important people in trouble, the only logical conclusion to be drawn is that he was murdered. Another individual whom I strongly suspect was also murdered, was general Patton. I believe he commented about WW2 and about how Americans fought on the wrong side. My guess is the Jews that controlled the government had him killed so that he would not go on and realize more and more stuff that he shouldn't be realizing. When a general says stuff like that, it carries a lot of weight, and then Americans might be waken up. Can't have that.

@@@@

Governments in the West use gang-stalking to kill regular citizens, who are defenseless and not protected by any guards, and they use professional assassins to kill leaders of nations who are typically protected by guards. In fact, I am not making this up. The CIA literally has a special little unit, I forgot the name of it, I think it was Department D, or something? Anyway, it doesn't matter what the actual name is. The important thing is, the CIA, a very key part of the government (also known as the Deep State), literally has professional assassins on their payroll. I bet this is kept a very high-level, sensitive secret, known only to very few CIA personnel. They know that if a lower-level CIA agent, who is typically white, knew about it, then it would have devastating consequences for the organization. By the way, for more ways that governments use to murder political dissenters, or anybody who makes trouble for them, please go through the rest of my postings here.

@@@@

It seems a lot of people are having trouble finding jobs. I know that from my personal experience, that the job market has indeed gotten extremely competitive in the recent years. I was able to get a McJob about 16 years ago or so. And now, there is absolutely nothing, and I sent out quite a few resumes. It makes sense though, the country has let in so many immigrants, there really aren't enough jobs and resources to go around in general. And it appears that the people just take it, even though conditions are really really bad and are only getting worse. And this is because our government knows that it would really take A LOT for the masses to do anything about things, and about the government. And the government also knows that, if that were to happen, it can very easily put it down, because the armed forces, the police, the courts, everybody that has any power, are all a part of it. It's like I have always said, the government does not fear us.

@@@@

Commenting on the Israeli (who are essentially Jews) treatment of Palestinians. Jews do these things because they see absolutely nothing wrong with Total War. In fact, all the conflicts with other peoples they go into, this is their only goal. These people have no humanity, no mercy, no tears. They will destroy, knock down, kill everything and everyone, in pursuit of their demented goal.

@@@@

Regarding the fact Israel is located among hostile people. I have always said, Jews should have created a nation for themselves somewhere in Africa, where there would be much less resistance and therefore bloodshed. But of course, Jews HAD to have their way. They HAD to live somewhere in the middle east, surrounded by hostile people, because their shitty little made-up book said that that's the land promised to them, or some such garbage. By the way, whenever I bring up the above, some people like to say how it was the Western Powers that allocated that area to Jews after the war. First of all, the Western Powers wouldn't have done that, if they hadn't been pressured/persuaded (or some such Obviously, none of us will ever find out what really happened) by Jews. Secondly, anytime someone says this, I know that I am dealing with a Jew-apologist. These people are easy to spot, in any conversation that has to do with Jews or Israel, the first thing they do, doesn't matter what the specific topic is about, is to make excuses for Jews and what they do. Watch this for yourself.

And then there is the famous Samson option. I have heard about this many, many times. This shows how the Jewish mind works. They are full of hate, for the entire world. And they can only think about revenge, getting back at people, fucking with other people. "If we are going to die, we are taking everybody else with us". God, even the way they die fills me with extreme hate.

Low iq spotted

Some people like to accuse me of being "racist". Well, I don't care about judging someone's character, not by the color of their skin, not by anything else. The only thing I know is, I don't like the physical looks of certain groups of people, and as a result, I want to live far away from them, and not have anything to do with them. Is this "racism"? I guess according to the Left, and the government, it is. But then, I don't care. I will choose for myself however I want to live my life, and I will choose for myself however I want to view the world. If I want to be "racist", it's none of anybody's business.

@@@@

When some kind of scandal breaks out, a lot of people say that they are mad. But what does that anger do? Does it lead to you doing anything to punish bad politicians? Does it motivate you to make any real changes? No. All it does is that it festers in your mind, making you unhappy, but it does not lead to anything productive. When you are just angry but don't take any action, then that anger is useless.

And a related thing: I am sure we are aware that some groups have been talking about using force....etc, to take back control. You know what I mean. While I agree with the sentiment behind it, for I sincerely believe that most politicians, and almost all who are in positions of power, are literally more like animals than humans. They don't respond to anything other than force. If you try to appeal to their better angels, their softer/higher side, then sorry, you might as well be trying to teach a snake about being kind. However, these politicians, are also very intelligent. They will tell the masses that some people are using violence. Which is meant to legitimize their use of coercive power, police or sometimes even military force, to violently put down the ones who resist them. And the masses think the government is justified in its violence, because most people are too stupid to tell the difference between force and violence.

@@@@

I have noticed that the mainstream media, who are basically a tool of the Jews and the Deep State that they control, like to seize upon any firearm-related tragedies, and use it as an opportunity to push their gun-grabbing agenda. So, they essentially capitalize on human suffering, to advance their political agenda. Examples abound.

@@@@

I have been trying to figure out exactly what the Covid "vaccines" do. I bet they really do alter white people's DNA forever, most likely by targeting their gametes (gametes are cells like the sperm or egg). If this is the case, don't fret yet. The shots can only change the DNA in the gametes, however, there are also somatic cells, whose DNA they don't change, or at least I hope they don't. Somatic cells are the cells that are other than gametes, so basically any cell in the rest of the body. It is possible to work out one's genetic sequence, from one's somatic cells, and then use that to make proper gametes, it just take some time. So, in the worst case scenario, as in, all the white people have been forcibly injected with the shots, it will still give us about 80 years of time, because that's roughly how long it would take, for the last, proper white person to die, after which point, there will be no more real white people. Another thing you can do, is to use the service of a molecular geneticist, and get a copy of the sequence of your DNA, before they are altered permanently.


@@@@

I also hear talks that try to make the distinction between Jews and the "Zionist Jews". What this really means, is that some people, who are very likely Jewish, realize that white people are waking up, and that their place in the West is getting extremely precarious. And their minds naturally catastrophize (catastrophize just means to think about the worst case scenario, essentially), because that's the way they have evolved, having lived among hostile white people and struggled against them, for thousands of years. So, what these Jews are hoping to do, is to plant the seed in white people's mind that not all Jews are alike, which is of course true. However, what these people want, that is, the "bad" Jews, you know, the ones who occupy various positions in the governments, the ones who are industry captains, you know, really important, influential Jews who nevertheless use their power, wealth and influence, to do harm instead of good. And believe me, these people are incredibly intelligent, and they are extremely good at surviving. They want to convince white people to spare the good Jews, which they should, but these bad Jews who really shouldn't be spared, will manage to find a way to disguise themselves as the good ones. And then they survive, and then they will go on and pass on their genes, making more evil people in the future. In fact, mark my words. You will soon hear a lot of things along the variation of, "Not all Jews are like that", or "Not all Jews are bad". See it for yourselves.

@@@@

I have often hear people talk about Mutually Assured Destruction, in the context of nuclear warfare, and how it acts as a deterrence. To that, I just want to say that whoever said this, is hopeless naive, and is very likely a white person. A typical white person cares about the lives his fellow Americans, and he really would balk at the thought of having an exchange with a nuclear power. However, very often, the POTUS does not think like that. He does not care at all about the lives of Americans. He only cares about the lives of himself and his loved ones. If some Americans do get incinerated in a nuclear firestorm, trust me, he absolutely does not care. He only acts he cares, because he knows if he doesn't, he will get kicked out or maybe even get sent to jail. So he acts like it. This actually goes much deeper than nuclear weapons and such. It fundamentally shows that people, especially white people, tend to believe that other people think like they do. That they feel the way they do, and they see the world the same they do. This is not only a false, hopeless naive way of approaching the world, it's actually incredibly dangerous, for the person himself. It puts him in a really vulnerable position. It sets him up to be defenseless, against all those who would prey upon him, and a lot of these, are in his very own government. So my warning to white people: Do NOT assume others think like you. Especially do not think your politicians think like you. Furthermore, non-white races also think very, very differently from you do. The most salient example of this, is Jews. The alien race that has existed among you for the longest, and who have always evolved to be the deadliest against you.

I seem to hear this sentiment a lot: Whenever there is any kind of conflict between the government and the masses, some people like to think that the government is always right. This is sometimes false, and not only that, it is also an incredibly dangerous way of thinking. For it means that people will blindly throw their support behind the government, whom they mistakenly believe to always have good, kindly intentions, and then, these people's support, which manifests as tax money, is then used by the government, to oppress and put down regular people but more frequently, dissenters, those who go against the government, the "troublemakers". So, any time there is a conflict between the government and the masses, ideally we want to have an open debate, listen to both sides, to see who really is in the right. And when that's not possible, which is often the case because the government would never allow such a debate to take place in the first place, then the safest thing we can do, is to assume that the government is wrong. For one thing, a government that refuses to have an open debate, is highly, highly suspect. Secondly, do we really trust the government? The entity that has such a huge track record of being dishonest, secretive, hiding things from the public, allowing black sites by key agencies, weaponing the Justice process as well as the FBI to go after someone they don't like...etc etc, the list really is too long, but suffice to say, I truly do believe the government has a very well-deserved, very unsavory reputation. And there really is a very good reason for it. And it is that, the government truly is an force of Evil. So, not only should we not put our trust in our government, we should actively spread awareness among regular people, to alert them to the fact their government is not there to serve them, but rather, to oppress and harm them. Make sure you come with plenty of well-researched examples that people can easily verify for themselves. And try to make sure that they are examples well-known to the masses. People don't like to have to do research on obscure stuff. And don't talk in an antagonistic way. Approach people with calm, friendly, pleading words. Think of it this way, you want to make people see things our way. You want them to realize something you know, but they don't know yet. Go through my postings here for more tips. Alternatively seek out like-minded people who are wise and who have experience with these sorts of things. Failing that, read self-help books on how to influence people and win them over. And do not alienate people in any way whatsoever. We need every ally we can get. Every ally lost is a huge loss. We are literally in a struggle for survival. We have to be very, very, very, very careful.

Oh another quick tip: Don't use big words, because that would not help you at all. Also try and relate to people. Talk to them in a way that makes it easy for them to understand. Whenever possible, tailor your talk according to your audience. This one takes a bit of work, but you must learn to be good at it.


@@@@@@@@


The very fact that Holocaust museums exist in a country such as the USA, does not make sense whatsoever. The Holocaust, as it were, happened in Germany. And Germany is not the USA. In fact, the only commonality these two countries share, is that they are both populated by White, or Germanic/Nordic people. The fact that Jews insist on building their museums here, tells us something extremely important about their psychology, and that is, to them, all white people are the same. And furthermore, all white people are capable of rising up against them, so they feel the need to install a museum here, so as to pre-emptively instill proper guilt in white Americans, whom to them, are no different from Germans. Jews know that what they engage in, once found out by white people, will absolutely result in something incredibly serious. This is why they want to "inoculate", as it were, against any form of anti-semitism.

A very closely related phenomenon is that they like to put these subtle messages in white people's minds through the movies and TV shows that they pump out of the Hollywood that they control, is that it is good and noble for a white person to save Jews from any sort of harm, especially from what they refer to as "White supremacists". And we really should ask ourselves why they do this. Could it be that, deep down they know that what they do to white people, might indeed one day lead to such things happening, and further, they probably also know that they would have deserved it and that white people's anger would be justified and righteous. Seriously, ask yourselves. Why do Jews try so, so hard to put out these messages? I mean, look around yourselves. Turn on the TV, watch movies, consume any form of entertainment that is mainstream. And you will see exact what I mean. So again, ask yourselves. Why do Jews feel the need to do this?

This post was edited by JessiWan on Oct 21 2025 10:45pm

This one time, I wanted to buy gold from this place with cash. Much to my surprise, they told me that they would need to report any sales involving cash when it was over a certain amount. I was both surprised and confused. However, I had nobody to ask. I didn't know who made up this law, why he made this law, and there was no way for me to challenge this law or voice my concern or even question it in any way.

It's not about the gold anymore. Think about the society we are in, politicians pass all kinds of law, many of which very clearly put restrictions on our freedoms. But we as the people have no recourse when we are in disagreement with these laws. I feel that this isn't right. If there are going to be laws that concern us in such fundamental ways, we need to be able to question and challenge them, and to know who passed them and why.

What I would do if I were a law-maker: I would make it known that I am the author of a particular law. I would then explain my reason for passing this law. I would put all this information very publicly, say, on a relevant government website. Then, I would give people the opportunity to write in to me, to voice their concerns about the law, to question the reason/s behind the making of the law, to tell me that my law is crap, and in some cases, to maybe even change my mind completely and to make me rescind it. All this would be made public for all to see. I imagine it could take the shape of a public forum, much like this forum. And it would be my job to publicly defend my law against criticism.

Regarding people not liking certain laws: people don't really have any recourse if they disagree with a law. There are currently very few ways for people to voice their concern/displeasure about a law. They cannot change a law very easily. it's technically true that they can try and lobby their Congressman to get the laws changed, however in practice it's so difficult, time-consuming and potentially expensive that it's not a true option.

Do you think this would be something you could get behind?