Quote (Crud1ty @ Aug 11 2019 01:11pm)

yeah u dont need grabbity and I dont need grabbity. But the constellation consistently shows us how the cookie crumbles. Umad? tell us about ur zero point optical perspective plz. Mby at least one utube vid?

Quote (Ep0ch @ Aug 11 2019 01:10pm)

i did the same like 2 years ago. He's been pissed ever since.

Quote (card_sultan @ Aug 11 2019 06:28pm)

Wrong , the burden of proof is on the one making ridiculous claims
You claim a special magic invisible earth daddy force that you cant reproduce or show,
claim the earth is speeding through an infinite vacuum at 2,000.000 mph
breaking the second law of thermodynamics and a faith in Narnia cause you've seen cartoons of it,
and faith in the consensus but the furthest you've been up is maybe 10 miles.

Flat Earth is an observation, bodies of water are flat and level, they is no measurable or visible curve, there is no magic force
Burden of Proof is clearly on Your Spaceball Religion.



If your simply repeating stuff from a book without knowing if it is true - that is hearsay

hearsay[ heer-sey ]SHOW IPA
SYNONYMS|EXAMPLES|WORD ORIGIN
SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR hearsay ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one's direct knowledge:
I pay no attention to hearsay.
an item of idle or unverified information or gossip; rumor:
a malicious hearsay.

Newton does no experiments to show gravity, that's how real science is done, upou need an independent variable to manipulate
otherwise it s just a useless claim, a theory and not a Law - that's pseudoscience, cartoon physics
and before you claim Cavendish showed something - no.
What he actually did was use what was called supporting the Center of Mass - thereby making either ends of the torsion bar
he used essentially weightless making his test pure magic show and not a proof of mass attracting mass
There is no proof of your claims at all - absolutely none
There are in fact experiments that show flat earth as true
your denial of them only shows a willful bias - not an understanding.

Quote (Ep0ch @ Aug 11 2019 01:13pm)

he can omit any evidence that contradicts his views and opinions. as long as he doesnt forget what those are. which hes been known to do.

Quote (card_sultan @ Aug 11 2019 01:13pm)

are you talking about the pic you posted 2 years ago that you copied and claim you took, that used a wide angle lense that curves the horizon?

So you don't understand optics do you, figures.

Quote (card_sultan @ Aug 11 2019 08:13pm)

are you talking about the pic you posted 2 years ago that you copied and claim you took, that used a wide angle lense that curves the horizon?

So you don't understand optics do you, figures.

Quote (kai_jph @ Aug 11 2019 01:14pm)

The burden of proof is if you want others to believe your claims. Like chivas
If you dont care about people believing your FE theories (like you said), then yes you are not obligated to prove them

If its just the claim itself your claims are not less rediculous since you have not proven any if them and even admit you can't prive them

(As far as newton goes) like I said, it will always be hearsay to you
To be honest it has been a few years since I read it

I do remember he discusses gravaity in detail in the last book 3

In any case (in the book)
He did mention a lot of his theories as just that.
He also mentioned here and there why they could be true and false or as he put it problems with them.

Quote (card_sultan @ Aug 11 2019 08:28pm)

I dont care if others believe my observations - the burden of proof is on you if you claim earth is moving through a vacuum at 2,000,000 mph
something you know you cant do - and are forced into trying to shift your burden of proof from the House of Cards you blindly believe in
you just cant accept the facts - because of the zealotry you practice.
My claims are not ridiculous, they are observable. You've never been to Narnia (spaceball Fantasy Island)

As for Newton - here's what he said about Gravity:
"It is inconceivable, that inanimate brute matter should, without the mediation of something else, which is not material, operate upon and affect other matter without mutual contact … That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance, through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent, acting constantly according to certain laws; but whether this agent be material or immaterial, I have left to the consideration of my readers.

Third letter to Bentley, 25 Feb 1693. Quoted in The Works of Richard Bentley

so he said you have to be crazy to believe in it - awesome - what a genius troll!

Quote (Ep0ch @ Aug 11 2019 01:15pm)

see you still remember it like it was yesterday.
burned into your brain like witnessing a homicide.

GG wuzezpk RIP

-e

remember when you always cried RIP was a death threat.

present you, and past you, is a total "what ever the most insulting thing to you is"

Quote (card_sultan @ Aug 11 2019 08:32pm)

Saying RIP to someone who is still alive after you post a video about santa slaughtering people is a death threat
you are one sick individual for sure, you prove it all the time, please get help.