And I'm looking FE proof.

You the one shifting the burden of proof since you post FE theories in a thread stating the earth is flat in the OP

As we duscussed countless times have never asked anyone to accept my belief.

So if you are unwilling to post proof for your own theories you weaken your own argument making them hearsay especially since you even admit being unable to prove it

There have been quite a few other FE threads before this one and you have not proven a single one of your theories in any of them
Now you dont have to give answers if you dont want, but then you have to demand them

But now since we don't care what the other believe there's not much more to discuss then.

This post was edited by kai_jph on Aug 10 2019 10:25pm

Typo
Now you dont have to give answers if you dont want, but then you have no right to demand them



1st mentioned page 14. It would still be hearsay to you since you disagree it exists and use a container theory in your model

But to be fair you reminded me of a book I found interesting so downloaded a copy . If you still want to know, let me know

hearsay
noun
information received from other people which cannot be substantiated

Ironically you actually said it wasn't hearsay since the info exists in the book. There are many references to it
And you added a discription of all your and chivas theories

This post was edited by kai_jph on Aug 11 2019 01:26am

Wrong , the burden of proof is on the one making ridiculous claims
You claim a special magic invisible earth daddy force that you cant reproduce or show,
claim the earth is speeding through an infinite vacuum at 2,000.000 mph
breaking the second law of thermodynamics and a faith in Narnia cause you've seen cartoons of it,
and faith in the consensus but the furthest you've been up is maybe 10 miles.

Flat Earth is an observation, bodies of water are flat and level, they is no measurable or visible curve, there is no magic force
Burden of Proof is clearly on Your Spaceball Religion.



If your simply repeating stuff from a book without knowing if it is true - that is hearsay

hearsay[ heer-sey ]SHOW IPA
SYNONYMS|EXAMPLES|WORD ORIGIN
SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR hearsay ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one's direct knowledge:
I pay no attention to hearsay.
an item of idle or unverified information or gossip; rumor:
a malicious hearsay.

Newton does no experiments to show gravity, that's how real science is done, upou need an independent variable to manipulate
otherwise it s just a useless claim, a theory and not a Law - that's pseudoscience, cartoon physics
and before you claim Cavendish showed something - no.
What he actually did was use what was called supporting the Center of Mass - thereby making either ends of the torsion bar
he used essentially weightless making his test pure magic show and not a proof of mass attracting mass
There is no proof of your claims at all - absolutely none
There are in fact experiments that show flat earth as true
your denial of them only shows a willful bias - not an understanding.

What do you get when you cross a crazy canuck with a flat earther?

IDK - would it be the opposite of yourself and not a blind crayon munching spaceball zealot who harasses other people who dont believe in his dogmatic astro-religion?

a hockey player - cause ice is flat.....!

Wrong. As usual. 1 Last guess before you are a total failure.

why constellation appears as it is?

you're a failure for thinking people should play your loser question game. I already told you the answer - burned yourself again.

and please tell us about the perspective and "event horizon". Can you do that with light? Im sure if light bends that way you can empiricaly prove that to us.