You're the dumbass pretending the atmosphere is pushing down on outstretched T-rex arms as being the reason you have to exert effort to keep your arms level. Don't project your monumental shortcomings on me.

your explanation of the 3rd dimension shows why u need to insult other and then claim they insulted you first, typical behavior for disguising your retardation.

Uniform motion involves moving your ass from one point to another - the next time i seesomeone getting sick from motion sickness i will tell them to stop faking it, your just experiencing uniform motion, an idiot told me.



so explain why your arms float in water - where is your gravity then - is it busy holding all the water to ball earth?



you get your perspective from 10 year olds, sounds about right.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 20 2017 01:10pm

"is a change in elevation a change in path"

i honestly laughed at that for a good bit. its a PERFECT summary of why you can't understand that on the round earth model the horizon would still be flat. you don't even understand all 3 dimensions let alone simple english.



is your reading comprehension this bad? the earth orbiting around the sun is uniform motion that none of us feel. a boat going up and down is variable motion. maybe now you understand.

Buoyancy, duh. It's one of those things you don't understand. Gravity is still working, keeping you and the water on the face of the planet.

First of all a circle is round - how intellectually dishonest are you to not know this, when a a 5 year old can point that out.

Oh really the Earth is orbiting the sun - in an constant ellipse right? at 66,600 mph?

I'm convinced, earth is flat and there's no gravity. If gravity is real, explain how one kid on a seesaw goes up. Shouldn't gravity be pulling him down? Checkmate, spherechuckers.

wow this is getting hilarious.

let's make this real simple, you've been claiming for years the flat horizon is proof the earth is flat. then you got embarrassed and shown it would be flat on BOTH models and now you're dodging as if its doing anything but making you look worse. for years you put that shit forward thinking it was proof, only to have it crash down at your feet. now you can't even acknowledge it because you're so embarrassed.

then you move on to the same shit in another lane. "wouldn't we feel a 66kmph motion i certainly think so". feel it compared to what? you've never stopped moving.

watching you put forward "proof" that doesn't prove or disprove anything is even more fun than watching you fail 5th grade math.

you're a bad FlatEarther



That the horizon is flat is proof the Earth is flat, that you think the flat horizon is a result of living on a ball and the horizon is just 360 x your stupid idea of perspective by using a 2 d side view which allows you to draw a str line but denotes that your angle of view to see the horizon is always less than 90 degrees is intellectual dishonest - just like you are.

I dare you to show me your 2d side view of where you think the horizon is on a globe and then shift your view to parallel and right behind where the person is and explain to me how that is fuking flat.

I really dare you, are you afraid?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 20 2017 01:48pm

your language is so puzzling i don't understand what you're even asking for. perhaps if i understood what you're even asking for i could answer. but as you just keep mixing your own unproven views in with unknown to me situations i can't even respond.

you just keep saying things like "2d side view" and "horizon is always less than 90 degrees" and " the horizon is just 360 x your stupid idea of perspective"

none of those things mean anything to me as none are correctly using technical terms. im sitting at a computer this very instant working on a 3 dimensional drafting software in which i just drew a MASSIVE sphere. then i zoomed in tilted my view and slowly rose. whoa, would u look at that, the horizon of what i can see on the sphere appears flat. whoa.

you can't acknowledge this because it puts a hole in your theory that not even buzzwords can argue. which is why rather than addressing my facts you're trying to deflect by claiming i don't understand perspective. Lucky for me i dont have to mentally conceptualize it, i can literally build a 3d model right in front of myself, if i had any vid capture software i'd be happy to make you a youtube video but i dont sadly.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jan 20 2017 01:57pm

schnauze, du jude