Quote (Blorgg @ Jul 27 2019 07:24am)
U get an E for effort.
But let’s face it, it’s 2019 and u hold access the a world of information and u chose to be a flat earther.
No amount of evidence will convince u. U already claim to have the answers like a true narcissist and u don’t even plan on changing ur mind because it makes u feel like ur on another level than most.
After all this time, u guys have had more than enough to prove ur claims. But after hundreds of utube channels and thousands of memes, seems like ur research still hasn’t been able to explain ONE SINGLE basic concept that can be applied and used with consistency.
Flat earth map? Nope
Size of anything in the sky? Nope
Explanation for why things fall? Density, LOL
Size of earth? Unknown
Explanation for eclipses? Nope
Predictable weather based of flat earth concepts? Nope
Please provide ANYTHING other than crying about ur feelings being hurt please.
Globe Earth proves - there is a curve but you cant measure it, there is a molten core but you cant see it. there is a space vacuum but you cant go to it, there is a mafic force but you can measure it or show it between 3 bodies, level is actually curved, there is a spin but you cant feel it but pendulums can. Wake up man.
All your maps are flat -you just imagine them on the paper earth globe model that can't hold water and doesnt actually work.
The size of everything is the sky is just based on an assumption Venus is the same size as Earth and looking up doesnt determine the shape of what you are standing on. Also, if you understood how zero point optical perspective works - you know why things appear to optically raise and are occulted by your limited range of 3d vision, and how spherical aberration affects things in a telescope.
Things fall because of the RELATIONSHIP between two things - the item and the medium it exists in, you claiming just density is you being deliberately misleading cause you love the RELATIONSHIP with your special mafic force that no one can explain or reproduce.
Size of the earth - that's just a Cavendish magic trick where he used a supported Center of Weight fallacy along with polarity and some mathematical abstractions to show you his biased confirmations.
Eclipse are explained by understanding the nodal points, the fundamental plane and the Saros cycle. Also The American Ephemeris which lists Data recorded by The Astronomical Society for 150 years has also tracked the path of Lilith, maybe you should find out what that is before you start ranting about things you dont know or understand.
Predictable weather? What are you talking about - weather predictions basically suck - any weathermans record is basically 50%, but its the best we got. I've never heard anyone in 4 years and 1000s of hours of debates on the shape of the earth that has used "weather" as an excuse to prove globe earth, but if you wanna try - go for it.
Face it, your model (Heliocentricity) comes Directly from the Vatican who hired Copernicus to write it and being the keepers of information, gave him the ancient Greek to plagiarize from , who had taken their beliefs directly from Heliopolis (Now called Baalbek - Ba'al = Satan, Bek = Beak or mouth of the beast). You clearly need to do lottsa research kid, sounds like you watched one single FE debunk video on youtube, and now want to pretend you're smart now, cause you think you're informed when your just MISINFORMED, as per usual.