So your saying Oxten is a accelerant fuel to fire.....

your plea to a rhetorical man made word that defines your "usual" thinking is duly noted.

Good stuff keep it up

fuel[ fyoo-uhl ]SHOW IPA
SYNONYMS|EXAMPLES|WORD ORIGIN
SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR fuel ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
1. combustible matter used to maintain fire, as coal, wood, oil, or gas, in order to create heat or power.
2. something that gives nourishment; food.
3. an energy source for engines, power plants, or reactors:
4. something that sustains or encourages; stimulant:
Our discussion provided him with "fuel" for debate.

Fuel can be combustible matter or it can be something that encourages something

JsP trolls dont understand the definition of words/10

Reality based world is what you meant.
Yes oxygen acts as an accelerant if an excess of fuel exists.

Fuel - 4. something that sustains or encourages; stimulant:

So, i can say:

Hugs are a fuel to fight depression

jsp troll:

Hugs are not combustible, {insert insult to fuel other trolls}

Now you're lying to me @bold. For oxygen itself to be explosive, it must be combustible. Oxygen helps other things explode. That's why it's considered highly reactive.

Atmospheric composition is Nitrogen, oxygen, argon, and trace elements. The first three are 99.96% of the atmosphere, and none are combustible. So no, you can't just "compress air leaving elements that are combustible."

Magnetic levitation by oxygen? Wut?

I'm sorry, what exactly is "more plausible than jumbo jets using fuel?"

To answer your question about "do we know how much fuel weighs," yes, we do. You can Google pretty much any commercial aircraft and find out how heavy it is empty and how heavy its MTOW (maximum takeoff weight) is.

The Spruce Goose's operational ceiling was never determined because it never underwent further pre-production testing. It lifted off once, to prove to Congress that it could fly and thus that Howard Hughes hadn't wasted the public's money developing it.

Is there anything else you'd like to be shown how you're wrong, today?

also - not only does oxygen acts as a stimulant to fire, it is required to even have fire.

So while rhetorically it is described as an accelerant - it is also a requirement to order to sustain burning
so in that regard, it is technically indistinguishable as a fuel source at a microscopic level

Are you just figuring this out? Like, several pages after we told you?

Patently false, and that's what we've been trying to say.

-Sorry - safety manuals list it as explosive - whether or not it combusts is irrelevant and not understand the definition of what a fuel is.
-Sorry but you forget to mention Ozone at higher levels in the air and the presence of water can be as much as 3%
-I gave links to sources that show how Ozone can support weight when levitated between magnetic sources and showed a photo that shows a magnetic field is created in Airplanes, try to keep up.
-Jumbo jets using 30 tanker trucks full of liquid fuel is highly improbable - it exceeds optimal weight to power ratios. Something else is going on.
-The Spruce Goose operational ceiling was never determined because it was too heavy because it exceeded an optimal power to weight ratio and was not fully understood, this was the dawn of powered flight, not with the help of the technological knowledge we employ today.

no - jsp trolls like yourself are saying its not a fuel source - im saying that technically it is a fuel source

not to mention that Technology can make any particle, a potential fuel source.

Maybe you would understand it more if i just used the word "magic" and "a wizard did it" - just like the magic force that holds you to the ground

"Airplane Pilots" [i mean wizards]
are using magic fairy dust, prove me wrong!