oh look who else can't read.....we talking about compressed air, not oxygen
nice subject dodge/diversion

he thinks he can crawl away by plating word games

hes an interesting tidbit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen

In the triplet form, O^2 molecules are paramagnetic. That is, they impart magnetic character to oxygen when it is in the presence of a magnetic field, because of the spin magnetic moments of the unpaired electrons in the molecule, and the negative exchange energy between neighboring O^2 molecules. Liquid oxygen is so magnetic that, in laboratory demonstrations, a bridge of liquid oxygen may be supported against its own weight between the poles of a powerful magnet.

Now also Consider an airplanes Airy Disk, few know about this because its a circular rainbow disk that appears under some airplanes that indicates there is some magnetic refraction of light taking place

https://i.imgur.com/j8AwleM.jpg

I'm not really sure what to make of that image. I don't know anything on the subject of Airy Disk, seems interesting though.

btw in science circles one simply does not refer to wikipedia. Try to dig into references used to create wiki article.

Flat Earth is real what do you think the bremuda triangle is

If flat earthers were intelligent enough to be successful they could just pay the $100,000 to go to space and see for themselves.

Still wouldn't work.
They'd probably say something like the rocket never left the dome (or whatever) and the windows are video monitors displaying CGI or what ever the CIA want them to see

Einstein wrote a bunch of papers, scientific papers, and published them in peer reviewed publications. The theories of relativity weren't a single work, they took years, with explanations and experiments for many supporting topics and tangents. I'm simply not going to start selecting individual papers for you to play pseudo-scientist with when your goal has never been to be honest. For fuck's sake, you can't even be honest about the flammability of oxygen.

Why are you posting this again? I already showed you in great detail how rocket propellant is a two part affair, with oxygen being supplied as the oxidizer and with liquid hydrogen et al being the flammable fuel. Propellant =/= just fuel.

And I exposed your links for not saying what you think they say. Over and over. A link about "how to separate oxygen from nitrogen" has no bearing on whether oxygen burns. Don't even get on me about presenting Scientific Citations, you don't provide them for the Earth being flat.



We are talking about compressed air in the sense that the more you can compress into the engine, the more OXYGEN in that air you can get to react with fuel. If nitrogen (the other main component of air) could burn, the first meteor in history would have set the atmosphere ablaze and we wouldn't be breathing right now.

You can read the papers and replicate the experiments yourself if you don't believe them. That's the thing about science, we publish the methodology we use so others can confirm.

Oxygen is used as a rocket propellant because it's required to burn things. If you just load oxygen into a rocket and try to fly you won't get anywhere, but if you mix oxygen with hydrogen and ignite then you get a much more complete burning than if you just relied on atmospheric oxygen.