d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Globe Earth
Prev1136213631364136513661933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 45,119
Joined: Oct 23 2007
Gold: 2,218.71
Warn: 40%
Jul 18 2019 04:23pm
Next page
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jul 18 2019 04:36pm
Quote (Santara @ Jul 18 2019 05:20pm)
According to Einstein, the debate as to whether it is a force is a philosophical one. That means that he acknowledges that legitimate arguments can be made both for and against. Because you can't grasp context and read for understanding, everything has to be explained to you over and over again.
Totally meets the dictionary:
I said I don't care what dresses you choose to wear.
The molten steel didn't come from jet fuel. Regardless, you're straying. We were talking about oxygen.


philosophical forces, so like a A Pseudo force (also called fictitious force, inertial force) is an apparent force, it's a force that's not really a force but you can think of as a force if your really don't understand the mechanics of what's going on. See, were really getting somewhere now.

How Liberal of you to think a man in a dress is a woman, I see how Hollywood has corrupted your warped thinking.

If the molten steel didn't comes from the fires started by the burning jet fuel in 9/11, where did they come from?

Quote (remco6 @ Jul 18 2019 05:13pm)
Go ahead and build your oxygen fueled car then , nothing stoping you but reality and we all know that doesn’t deter you.


Cars cant burn normal oxygen - however a jet engine acts like a centrifuge - that's odd. Why is that?
How do you separate plasma from blood - in a centrifuge right?
Could a jet engine be separating the bonds of the molecules that make up air and then compressing them to cause a controlled explosion or would something like that be outside the realm of science to accomplish because you limited understanding of the word Jet Engine doesn't contain the word rocket. Hmm?

Member
Posts: 5,650
Joined: Feb 25 2012
Gold: 620.79
Jul 18 2019 04:49pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Jul 18 2019 06:36pm)
philosophical forces, so like a A Pseudo force (also called fictitious force, inertial force) is an apparent force, it's a force that's not really a force but you can think of as a force if your really don't understand the mechanics of what's going on. See, were really getting somewhere now.

How Liberal of you to think a man in a dress is a woman, I see how Hollywood has corrupted your warped thinking.

If the molten steel didn't comes from the fires started by the burning jet fuel in 9/11, where did they come from?


Cars cant burn normal oxygen - however a jet engine acts like a centrifuge - that's odd. Why is that?
How do you separate plasma from blood - in a centrifuge right?
Could a jet engine be separating the bonds of the molecules that make up air and then compressing them to cause a controlled explosion or would something like that be outside the realm of science to accomplish because you limited understanding of the word Jet Engine doesn't contain the word rocket. Hmm?




While I'm not speaking directly on the attacks I would like to correct your science.

Aviation fuel while packing a lot of energy it is consumed too fast after ignition so sustain and build enough heat to melt structural steel beams. If I remember my fuel stats properly aviation fuel burns around 1500 degrees farenheit and the melting point of stell is somewhere above 2500. Unlikely anything inside an office building could burn with enough energy to reach those temperatures before being completely exhausted.

Thermite, however can be made to sustain energy in one place long enough to begin the melting process. There's a lot more to your debate than that however.

Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jul 18 2019 04:58pm
Quote (Hecht55 @ Jul 18 2019 06:49pm)
While I'm not speaking directly on the attacks I would like to correct your science.

Aviation fuel while packing a lot of energy it is consumed too fast after ignition so sustain and build enough heat to melt structural steel beams. If I remember my fuel stats properly aviation fuel burns around 1500 degrees farenheit and the melting point of stell is somewhere above 2500. Unlikely anything inside an office building could burn with enough energy to reach those temperatures before being completely exhausted.

Thermite, however can be made to sustain energy in one place long enough to begin the melting process. There's a lot more to your debate than that however.


well your not correcting my science - I was the one who said Jet Fuel cant melt steel beams.

theses clowns are here on this website because of the truth of that statement that obviously makes you realize there was another source of the fires and that would make the whole event pre planned.
Member
Posts: 5,650
Joined: Feb 25 2012
Gold: 620.79
Jul 18 2019 05:09pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Jul 18 2019 06:58pm)
well your not correcting my science - I was the one who said Jet Fuel cant melt steel beams.

theses clowns are here on this website because of the truth of that statement that obviously makes you realize there was another source of the fires and that would make the whole event pre planned.



Pretty sure the source is called greed.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jul 18 2019 05:18pm
Quote (Hecht55 @ Jul 18 2019 07:09pm)
Pretty sure the source is called greed.


aint that the truth, everyone lost
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Jul 18 2019 05:52pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Jul 18 2019 05:36pm)
philosophical forces, so like a A Pseudo force (also called fictitious force, inertial force) is an apparent force, it's a force that's not really a force but you can think of as a force if your really don't understand the mechanics of what's going on. See, were really getting somewhere now.

How Liberal of you to think a man in a dress is a woman, I see how Hollywood has corrupted your warped thinking.

If the molten steel didn't comes from the fires started by the burning jet fuel in 9/11, where did they come from?


We aren't getting somewhere because you pretend Einstein is saying gravity doesn't exist, when he did not.

I didn't say what I think, you did.

Because under the right conditions, iron burns. Those conditions existed in the rubble pile.

LOX is still not rocket fuel.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jul 18 2019 06:40pm
Quote (Santara @ Jul 18 2019 07:52pm)
We aren't getting somewhere because you pretend Einstein is saying gravity doesn't exist, when he did not.

I didn't say what I think, you did.

Because under the right conditions, iron burns. Those conditions existed in the rubble pile.

LOX is still not rocket fuel.


Please provide a Scientific citation that earth is moving at 2,000,000 mph in a vectored direction and that air - a free moving substance is velcroed to the earth in lockstep and if earth is an open containerless system as NASA claims, explain why airplanes traveling against the direction of this movement dont need to account for the force you think is there. If you fail to prove this acceleration, i would think its because that acceleration is 0, and Big G is just a pseudo force in your spaceball fantasy.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel

A fuel is any material that can be made to react with other substances so that it releases energy as heat energy or to be used for work.

If compressed oxygen can be flammable or combust (which i provided links too) when combined with other chemicals, please provide Scientific Citation that shows in no way - Oxygen can be consider as a fuel source as you claim.
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Jul 18 2019 07:21pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Jul 18 2019 07:40pm)
Please provide a Scientific citation that earth is moving at 2,000,000 mph in a vectored direction and that air - a free moving substance is velcroed to the earth in lockstep and if earth is an open containerless system as NASA claims, explain why airplanes traveling against the direction of this movement dont need to account for the force you think is there. If you fail to prove this acceleration, i would think its because that acceleration is 0, and Big G is just a pseudo force in your spaceball fantasy.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel

A fuel is any material that can be made to react with other substances so that it releases energy as heat energy or to be used for work.

If compressed oxygen can be flammable or combust (which i provided links too) when combined with other chemicals, please provide Scientific Citation that shows in no way - Oxygen can be consider as a fuel source as you claim.


Einstein: 1907-1915. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_publications_by_Albert_Einstein ...and the successive science built upon it.

Oxygen isn't what releases energy. Fuel does. Oxygen reacts WITH the fuel.

Oxygen by itself can do no such thing and I have successfully addressed every attempt on your part to assert so.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Jul 18 2019 08:41pm
Quote (Santara @ Jul 18 2019 09:21pm)
Einstein: 1907-1915. [URL=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_publications_by_Albert_Einstein]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_publications_by_Albert_Einstein[/URL] ...and the successive science built upon it.

Oxygen isn't what releases energy. Fuel does. Oxygen reacts WITH the fuel.

Oxygen by itself can do no such thing and I have successfully addressed every attempt on your part to assert so.


your assertion that because Einstein wrote a book about a pseudo force is about as Credible a proof as saying God Exist cause some people wrote the bible. I need stuff like experiments and observable evidence thats logically sound. I there any physical proof of the Big G, or does NASA use it to claim the travel to different planets, can you make a real working model that uses Big G?

As for oxygen - I fully understand your claim is what you believe, how ever
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen
Common uses of oxygen include production of steel, plastics and textiles, brazing, welding and cutting of steels and other metals, rocket propellant, oxygen therapy, and life support systems in aircraft, submarines, spaceflight and diving.

Plus i gave you those links that described compressed oxygen as flammable and combustible, that link that shows you how to separate it into Oxygen and Nitrogen, plus you haven't presented a Scientific Citation that asserts anything close to your claim.

Nothing new here really, you exist in your TV reality, you have what someone might call "in the box" thinking. Careful not to move around too much, you might break those chains.





Go Back To General Chat Topic List
Prev1136213631364136513661933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll