You didn’t say it in so many words but it’s the logical conclusion to others claims you made. Ofc your incapable of understanding this so I guess this is where it ends again.

Space flight and gliding. The space shuttle was not capable of powered, maintained flight. Its design goes back into the 70s as well.

@ posts 13413-13417, we've been through all of those in this thread and you've been refuted in every one of those topics.

Rood

Did you really just say bridges and the railroad prove flat earth?
At what point is this topic just flat out stupid

Your ability to grasp it

Come back with a coherent sentence then we can chat buddy.

Okay

so what your saying is that i never said it and since your incapable of understanding me you just make shit up.

keep being a trollflake wishing death on people.



bridges and railways dont account for curvature - you can add canals to that as well.
Stop spamming, bring proof of your claim, not just ad-hom attacks.



it could fly, what do you think those 3 jet engines in the back where for - just to make it pretty?
you are just shown pretty pictures with edited sound turned off.

Your refusal to admit to facts only proves your indoctrination to the state church - 'Merika.

You mean the rocket engines? The engines that have no fuel after the main tank is detached? Those three engines? Yeah, I've seen them.

Since none of those items you listed was a fact, I don't have a problem here. Seeing as each and every one of those was addressed in this thread in some fashion or another, and we've pointed out to you why they're all wrong, it is indeed you who is impervious to facts.

Jet engines dont use rocket fuel, Captain Science.

You fear links that aren't embedded and videos that dont praise the spinning ball.

U R A Victim of propaganda since birth.