Quote (card_sultan @ Jun 17 2019 06:03pm)
1 single point is drawing - zero point is reality
2 No picture at horizon - no proof the horizon is a physical place as you assert.
3. Not my problem a sheep doesnt understand how Power works. Baaaaa
4. your a shining example of auto believing what your told.
5. So explain Selenelion eclipses using your 2d side view muppet vision line of sight reasoning , ok.
1. And in zero point perspective the sun would never fall below the horizon on a flat earth.
2. Glad to see you're only willing to dodge the fact that the sun would never appear to fall below the ground on a flat earth.
3. Considering you rely on a "conspiracy" and can't justify why any conspiracy would exist I'd say it is your problem, at least if you want to convince anybody you are correct. And since you post here for hundreds of pages at a time it's pretty clear you do.
4. Dodge, you can predict where the ISS will be at any given time with pretty much perfect accuracy. The reason is because science is repeatable, and the trajectory follows scientific principles like orbital mechanics. You, however, cannot explain how it got there, how it stays there, how it travels so fast, or determine where it will be at any given point.
5. Pretty easy, one or both are below the horizon, and you can only see them because the path of light bends as it travels through increasingly dense media (as the light travels from the upper atmosphere to the lower atmosphere, this is basic optics you will be able to prove both mathematically, and experimentally, if you take any Physics II class in college). This means you can see the light from the moon above the horizon, even though the moon itself is physically below the horizon. Interestingly, this is the exact opposite of what would be required for the sun to appear to go below the horizon on a flat Earth, i.e. the light would have to bend in the opposite direction than it is observed to bend when it travels through media of changing density.