Sorry bud I only read first paragraph of your post now I read all and stopped at 'Nasa images are not real'.

I take everything I said back. Had no idea it was a conspiracy post.

You really think everything was fake? There would be waaaay too many people in on it. That reason alone is enough reason.

all Pilots on the planet are lying to everyone about...

the routes they are flying
the altitude they are flying
the speed they are flying
the amount of fuel they are using
the amount of weight on the aircraft they are piloting
and every pilot is a secret member of NASA



this is what card believes... your welcome i just saved you 30 posts of arguing

Yeah no wonder he got 50%

Thing is you can believe whatever you want, but if you want others to accept it as fact you need to back it up

In Card's case when he fails to prove his fantasies using only YT and image hosting sites he goes on an amusing cussing parade

Lastly (In his own words) he doesn't care about warns and I quote: "warnings make you a warrior" or that he's willing to be a martyr for his beliefs
So some of us just prod his bs theories by questioning or asking him for proof to "help him along"

(You'll never convince him and Chivas)

This post was edited by kai_jph on Jun 17 2019 02:13am

It's the other way around. The burden of proof is on the person who claims something.

That's okay, we can prove the Earth is shaped like a ball.

Pretty much what I meant.
He claims the earth is flat along with all the laws and theories supposed to support it and expects us to accept it

Shifting of the Burden of Proof

onus probandi

(also known as: burden of proof [general concept], burden of proof fallacy, misplaced burden of proof, shifting the burden of proof)

Description: Making a claim that needs justification, then demanding that the opponent justifies the opposite of the claim. The burden of proof is a legal and philosophical concept with differences in each domain. In everyday debate, the burden of proof typically lies with the person making the claim, but it can also lie with the person denying a well-established fact or theory. Like other non-black and white issues, there are instances where this is clearly fallacious, and those which are not as clear.

Pretty much where Card Fails

Take this for example



I provided a vid proving the opposite. Card has avoided providing a vid to support it

Many other examples

This post was edited by kai_jph on Jun 17 2019 11:26am

Never argue with stupid people. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.