wrong again




I presented a video that explained how perspective works on objects already far away from you

not my problem you cant see how this would affect things already far far away from you,

and it's your job to prove your claim and your cherry picking assertion while crying about rhetoric is just another epic failure on your part to understand reality.

Yea pretty much , change the angle something is viewed at , add some mumbo-jumbo about perspectives and laws, and hope no one notices the answer didn’t change just because you rotated the page sideways.

sorry - trig is just numbers on a paper, show me real evidence the earth is a ball, you cant do it.



skill at creating logical fallacy does not prove your assertion, where does it say that trig proves your ball earth model, please post that proof

inb4 fail again

cant post evidence earth is a space ball, ok

go to plan #2 - your believe in ball earth is just denying earth is flat

thanks for smashing yourself

so airplanes at an airshow are at 30,000 ft, cool story bro - send pics

Numbers can be used to represent reality. For example if one ball is 1’ away and another is 7’ away the further one will appear a lot smaller. If one ball is 6’ away and another is 8’ away they will appear much closer in size.

This post was edited by remco6 on Jun 16 2019 11:46am

Video of plane maintaining the same size flying away at 30000ft like you said ?

lets talk about the blatant inconsistencies between your a chivas model like more land beyond Ice Wall or not for example.




And it your job to prove yours . I provided a vid. You can disagree if you like.

You made a claim of a plane appearing the same size as it flies 30000ft overhead away. Lets see a vid of that .

This post was edited by kai_jph on Jun 16 2019 11:57am

watch the video that was posted, objects that are on the same level as you dont have the same size changes as object on an optical plane 30,000 feet - 3000 miles away from you.

Again you have no evidence of your ball earth fantasy, your belief is just creating logical fallacies and straw man arguments in order to dismiss reality.




sorry, you made the claim the abject far away from you should have the same change size as objects on your same level, i posted proof that is not the case
Ill send you a box of kleenex

you made this claim


So no vid of a plane to back up your claim to display this .

Even after you repeated the claim


That's cool. Then we can shelve this theory as fantasy

This post was edited by kai_jph on Jun 16 2019 12:04pm

I watched the vid , the change in apparent size is directly related to the distance from camera. Muttering some nonsense about planes and perspectives and calling it a law while rotating the axis objects are viewed from only fools weak minded people like you and your fellow flat earthers.