Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 18 2017 03:37pm)

Heliocentrism = balls in space theory and the resurrection of phallic rockets, also Newton was a confirmed bachelor - so pretty gay




surface tension ≠ gravity while neither is the fundamental force of nature - i wouldn't expect you to understand this beyond your logical fallacy understanding

fractals have nothing to do with the shape of the world so unless your picasso maybe id call that one a reach

Who is Bill Nye the liar Actor Guy - good question. Fortunately he had a moment of clarity in between his job of being a lifelong shill for mainstream popular science.

12,000 kph lol you think we could go that fast , besides rockets dont work in a vacuum but im sure you dont even know why - but keep faith in whatever your told.

Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 18 2017 11:57pm)

So you claim that you're perspective is 100% correct but that based on what your told to think but then you also say you never heard Nasa claim they cant get past low earth orbit - so your perspective is based on blind faith

So keep your head in the sand, wallow in your ignorance or inform your pespective and think for yourself

https://youtu.be/FmoiwjXepHM



Earth surface is 71% water, we've actually only drilled down 8 miles - what is beyond that is pure speculation - not fact.

Quote (Leevee @ Nov 19 2017 08:38am)

Why do you think it's based on what I'm told to think? What do you think I have been told to think?

Quote (Melatonina @ Nov 18 2017 12:53pm)

lol I think we could go that fast how silly I am.. surface tension is why black holes are black I guess ? no gravity ^^^^
:rofl: poor guy
You know I'd actually pay just to see how you look like. or just to talk with you 30mins. too bad I dont live in stupidamerica. it really looks a funny place to be once in a lifetime.

rockets dont work in a vacuum btw is wrong. but you just dont know what mhd is so i wont blame you on this one.
mhd submarines rockets goes at like 2000 kph and the american B2 fly at like 20.000 kph (well anyways spaceships flies at double their speed..)
fyi mhd rockets creates their own plasma envelop therefore eliminating the problem of frictions in water/air. well I guess this must be fake aswell

card sultan I think you were not supposed to be born this late. you should have spawned in the middle age I mean how does it feel to always meet people who dont agree with you ?
how does it look like for you lol are you in a flat earth special dummies club lmao
You said "when anyone disagree" with you. Im sorry, but you're not "anyone" indeed you're pretty special and I've never met any flat earth people IRL (sorry I live in an educated country).

Just send me your tinder baby

Quote (JohnMiller92 @ Nov 18 2017 12:55pm)

LOLOL

I'm dead af rofl

Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 19 2017 03:17am)

black holes were created by Einstein playing a joke on the world that division by 0 was somehow possible , and they bought it, :rofl:

rockets dont work in a real vacuum - they just trick you by using a 60% vacuum so its like low Earth orbit

American B2 fly at 20k kph? can you provide a link for that - nvm ill just look it up. edit: google says Top speed: 1,010 km/h close.....

MHD rockets - never heard of them - ill look them up to - edit: Nvm/ first link i found was a link to aa Nasa fanboy forum so looks like they're talking about some sci fi crap

Was i born at the wrong time - dont think so since i was sent back to wake you from your delusions.

If you actually went to some of chats i go to, you'd lose your fake impression that flat Earthers are stupid and see there some really smart people in it . There are dummies to - but they're everywhere so whatever.

I can show you a picture of a dumb republican/liberal/independant/geek whatever - doesn't mean anything - would say more about me really.




did you catch that dead pan humour, good i try.

Quote (Melatonina @ Nov 18 2017 04:32pm)

everything new to you is some sc fi crap from nasa fan .. damn poor guy lol.
now just sho your titties fatty

Quote (ChivasRegal @ Nov 19 2017 03:50am)

because you haven't been able to provide any proof that you can think independently......you just accept what you are told from day 1 in school and then you memorize it and repeat it to receive good grades.

Quote (Leevee @ Nov 19 2017 04:47am)

I have never seen NASA admitting any of that, but it's quite irrelevant.

My personal reason for thinking we live on a globe is:
- the stars that are visible at specific times, at specific moments in time. you mean how the stars that are attached to the dome, which rotates a full revolution every 24 hours? seeing the same stars in the same location every night is simply not possible on a spinning ball hurtling through space
- the way the horizon "moves" when we change our vantage point. you lost me here....can you show me actual proof the horizon moves?

My personal reason for thinking we and the other planets revolve around the sun:
- the sun's movement through time - what in the actual heck are you talking about moving through time?
- the planets' movement through time, indicating that they too revolve around the sun - the naked eye can't see this, thus verify it for proof...you are just believing what you have been told...no independent thought expressed again...

These are things that all can be observed, most even without requiring a telescope.

I know that you like to use your own interpretation of perspective as a counter-argument, but I also know that your interpretation of perspective is wrong and that mine is correct. My conclusion is that we live on a roughly spherical Earth and that Earth revolves around the sun. Of course you don't have to agree with me, but it would be kind of you to stop trying to discredit me by discrediting information that I never quoted in the first place.