Quote (Leevee @ Nov 18 2017 09:17am)
I have never seen NASA admitting any of that, but it's quite irrelevant.
My personal reason for thinking we live on a globe is:
- the stars that are visible at specific times, at specific moments in time.
- the way the horizon "moves" when we change our vantage point.
My personal reason for thinking we and the other planets revolve around the sun:
- the sun's movement through time
- the planets' movement through time, indicating that they too revolve around the sun
These are things that all can be observed, most even without requiring a telescope.
I know that you like to use your own interpretation of perspective as a counter-argument, but I also know that your interpretation of perspective is wrong and that mine is correct. My conclusion is that we live on a roughly spherical Earth and that Earth revolves around the sun. Of course you don't have to agree with me, but it would be kind of you to stop trying to discredit me by discrediting information that I never quoted in the first place.
So you claim that you're perspective is 100% correct but that based on what your told to think but then you also say you never heard Nasa claim they cant get past low earth orbit - so your perspective is based on blind faith
So keep your head in the sand, wallow in your ignorance or inform your pespective and think for yourself
https://youtu.be/FmoiwjXepHMQuote (Queso @ Nov 18 2017 09:40am)
Why would you call it a water globe? Water makes up a quite small percentage of the Earth's mass. Perhaps you could share this data regarding the abundance of water on Earth.
Earth surface is 71% water, we've actually only drilled down 8 miles - what is beyond that is pure speculation - not fact.
Quote (Melatonina @ Nov 18 2017 10:00am)
History is made by winners. [so you agree it just a fake perspective]
the physic and others mathematical laws we found may not be the best way to interprete our world, but it is the best available yet, and concord with observations.
Your shit videos links shows nothing but a dense misinterpretations of real facts. [your idea of facts is your opinion - opinion is not fact]
An oxygen bubble in the water is round, do you agree ? [wtf does that have to do with anything a bubble is not a body of water, this is just a logical fallacy that appeals to your bias]
The law behind this perfect distribution and stabilty of the mass is the same that is behind the shape of planets or stars. [your "law" of planet formation is based on a 1 mm bubble of air - lol Surface tension is responsible for the shape of liquid droplets (air is a treated as a liquid too), not gravity.]
this the gravity and this is why you can jump in a train going at 300 kmh and, unfortunately, dont crush your back into the backdoor of the wagon. [The reason you can jump on a train going 300 kmh is that you are inside of a closed environment, try jumping on the outside of a train going 300 kmh and tell me how that goes. Earth is an open environment {and Bill Nye Confirmed it} - you know cause we flew to the moon - unless there was some kind of solid barrier you think they went though - was there?]
so your argument about felix's fake jump is easily explained yet again bro. deal with it [not my argument but it i know what he means, how can airplanes fly with spin or against the spin and flight times are not affected while also claiming that objects in air are affected by gravity and coriolis of the spin, its just a paradox of circle jerk logic they hope you'll never figure out. And if you do they just call you nuts and continue working on the mindless masses. Think of it like Whose on first - they continually say shit to confuse the weak minded and you fall for it]