can u prove it?

can u prove it?

He will say:
"Or he was just pulled up with a rope glued to the dome..."

Actually I can! Send me a couple hundred bucks. I need an Acril vacum chamber, 2 neodymium magnets, and a few litre liquid nitrogen

he moves with the earth, that is gravitation. open a book of physic ? dont believe in it ? stop using ur comp that was made from physic discoveries

Strange thing to say, when your only proof for flat earth is the fact that you don't believe the stuff that disproves it.

I cannot prove this particular thing, nor can you disprove it. Why would the conclusion be that you're right?

Another ad-hom attack from the troll who thinks hes not a troll



strange that your only proof for a spinning ball rocket earth are some fake pictures from the military propaganda wing of the state and a book that you never read from 500 years ago that was debunked by Einstein as incorrect, throw in some old wives tales, false assumption, some circle jerk logic sun worshipped relegion disguised as science, indoctrination of children since well before they could think for themselves and you really understand why FE is so trolled when you dont agree with the astro-priests dogma and faith.




Computers have nothing to do with the physics of the so called pseudo-force we mislabel as gravity- they work according to the laws of electricity, inertia and a real simple principle we call binary.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 18 2017 12:19pm

Can you point me to a post where I said that I put any credibility into NASA pictures?

You may remember the conversation where you wholeheartedly agreed with me when I said that fanatic globe-Earthers are dumb if they blindly believe proof without ever trying to verify the proof's validity themselves.

I have done my own share of observations, I know my reasons for believing what I believe, and I know that NASA's published pictures are not those reasons. So I am not sure why you're bringing that up.

Damn this thread went full retard