d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > RuneScape > Black Ops
Prev13456710Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 8,540
Joined: Mar 18 2009
Gold: 5,603.01
Oct 24 2011 07:00pm
Quote (Shinotoa @ Oct 24 2011 07:58pm)
Then you don't know good FPS, imo.
PC is just so much better.



I like source, but I honestly had soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much fun when I was like 24/7 on 1.6 with a bunch of my friends.


MMmmm IDK, I'd say that PC can handle better graphics and handle better perfomance shooters, but there is just more lag within PC gaming. Console shooters are good at gameplay but can't handle as performance and graphics heavy games as PC.


Quote (Storm_visor @ Oct 24 2011 07:59pm)
nope i played it when it came out, was pretty fun, but don't see it as the best cod


Take that back. The MW2 engine sucks so much. They could put like 5 new guns and 15 brand new maps into CoD4 and release it again. It was the GREATEST game ever, most balanced shooter I've ever played.

This post was edited by x2robbie2x on Oct 24 2011 07:01pm
Member
Posts: 19,506
Joined: Apr 12 2011
Gold: 0.00
Oct 24 2011 07:00pm
Quote (Shinotoa @ Oct 24 2011 08:58pm)
Then you don't know good FPS, imo.
PC is just so much better.


Not at all. Console > PC for FPS imo.

Then again I wasn't the "average gamer" back in the day.

I played weekly 2v2 tournaments for Cod4 and made $200+ a weekend, and was sponsored to play Cod4 until I put school first.

Quote (Shinotoa @ Oct 24 2011 08:59pm)
CoD 2?


I still play Cod3 from time to time

This post was edited by EnviousPvP on Oct 24 2011 07:01pm
Member
Posts: 12,586
Joined: Aug 30 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Oct 24 2011 07:02pm
Quote (EnviousPvP @ Oct 25 2011 12:57am)
Don't play FPS on the PC, so No.



You obviously didn't play it back in the day, or you were bad and ragequit/dashboarded every game.


Then Halo and Halo 2 are still >

e: afk, PM me for debates.

This post was edited by ioe on Oct 24 2011 07:03pm
Member
Posts: 4,109
Joined: Oct 2 2011
Gold: 1.01
Oct 24 2011 07:03pm
Quote (x2robbie2x @ Oct 24 2011 09:00pm)
MMmmm IDK, I'd say that PC can handle better graphics and handle better perfomance shooters, but there is just more lag within PC gaming. Console shooters are good at gameplay but can't handle as performance and graphics heavy games as PC.




Take that back. The MW2 engine sucks so much. They could put like 5 new guns and 15 brand new maps into CoD4 and release it again. It was the GREATEST game ever, most balanced shooter I've ever played.


i don't see it being balanced when half the people use m16 and mp5, but yeah it was pretty balanced
Member
Posts: 34,475
Joined: Aug 12 2009
Gold: 0.80
Oct 24 2011 07:03pm
Quote (EnviousPvP @ Oct 24 2011 06:00pm)
Not at all. Console > PC for FPS imo.

Then again I wasn't the "average gamer" back in the day.

I played weekly 2v2 tournaments for Cod4 and made $200+ a weekend, and was sponsored to play Cod4 until I put school first.



I still play Cod3 from time to time


mfw
Member
Posts: 8,540
Joined: Mar 18 2009
Gold: 5,603.01
Oct 24 2011 07:04pm
Quote (ioe @ Oct 24 2011 08:02pm)
Then Halo and Halo 2 are still >


I was not that fond of Halo because of the whole medpack thing, but Halo 2 is like my #2 favorite shooter. H3 was not that bad but def worse than 2, and Reach is just embarrassing. How the hell is the gaming industry getting WORSE at making games.


Quote (Storm_visor @ Oct 24 2011 08:03pm)
i don't see it being balanced when half the people use m16 and mp5, but yeah it was pretty balanced


Balanced as in, the snipers weren't used as close quarter weapons (until recently when everyone started quick scoping for some reason), and guns were not over powered, you either had high recoil and damage or had low recoil low damage. The m16 was good but only if you knew how to use it, which not many people did, and any gun could of killed them. The MP5 was also good but it was balanced because people didn't use it for it's performance but rather for looks, because the P90 has the same perfomance as the MP5. It is nowhere near the UMP on MW2 that kills people 1 shot across map, you had to burst your MP5 long range and even then it took like 6 hits to kill. '
Trust me.. best FPS ever.

This post was edited by x2robbie2x on Oct 24 2011 07:07pm
Member
Posts: 19,506
Joined: Apr 12 2011
Gold: 0.00
Oct 24 2011 07:04pm
Quote (ioe @ Oct 24 2011 09:02pm)
Then Halo and Halo 2 are still >


Halo 2 is dead online. Tried it last night at the party I was at.

But the Halo CE remake comes out Nov 15th, already have it ordered. Only reason I kept Halo Reach, is for the Halo CE DLC

Quote (Storm_visor @ Oct 24 2011 09:03pm)
i don't see it being balanced when half the people use m16 and mp5, but yeah it was pretty balanced


That's why you do what we did and get good with a different gun.

We ran MP44 / AK-47 / Mini-Uzi / R700 all with the 1911

This post was edited by EnviousPvP on Oct 24 2011 07:05pm
Member
Posts: 10,030
Joined: Aug 9 2009
Gold: 381.00
Oct 24 2011 07:04pm
Quote (x2robbie2x @ Oct 25 2011 01:00am)
MMmmm IDK, I'd say that PC can handle better graphics and handle better perfomance shooters, but there is just more lag within PC gaming. Console shooters are good at gameplay but can't handle as performance and graphics heavy games as PC.




Take that back. The MW2 engine sucks so much. They could put like 5 new guns and 15 brand new maps into CoD4 and release it again. It was the GREATEST game ever, most balanced shooter I've ever played.


I just hate controllers, seriously, make it so much less enjoyable.

Quote (EnviousPvP @ Oct 25 2011 01:00am)
Not at all. Console > PC for FPS imo.

Then again I wasn't the "average gamer" back in the day.

I played weekly 2v2 tournaments for Cod4 and made $200+ a weekend, and was sponsored to play Cod4 until I put school first.


Again, personally, I think that PC is just so much better and with the keyboard and mouse you just get a much better feel of everything.
I guess it's personal preference, but idk.
Member
Posts: 19,506
Joined: Apr 12 2011
Gold: 0.00
Oct 24 2011 07:07pm
Quote (Shinotoa @ Oct 24 2011 09:04pm)
I just hate controllers, seriously, make it so much less enjoyable.

Again, personally, I think that PC is just so much better and with the keyboard and mouse you just get a much better feel of everything.
I guess it's personal preference, but idk.


I mean yeah, it comes down to personal preference. I feel like I can perform better with a controller. I also play inverted because that's how my brain works. If I press up, I expect the outcome to be down.

But I play on 10 sensitivity and it still feels too slow for my reaction time
Member
Posts: 10,030
Joined: Aug 9 2009
Gold: 381.00
Oct 24 2011 07:11pm
Quote (EnviousPvP @ Oct 25 2011 01:07am)
I mean yeah, it comes down to personal preference. I feel like I can perform better with a controller. I also play inverted because that's how my brain works. If I press up, I expect the outcome to be down.

But I play on 10 sensitivity and it still feels too slow for my reaction time


Maybe my thumbs just suck, but I really can't use controllers for FPS.
But then again, I just love PC, would play all day if I could afford to :<
Go Back To RuneScape Topic List
Prev13456710Next
Closed New Topic New Poll