d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Entertainment Room > Books & Literature > Philosphy
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 2,143
Joined: Mar 18 2009
Gold: 147.50
Nov 6 2010 12:58am
I am currently reading Descartes Discourse on Method and was wondering if anyone has some suggestions to books they thought were interesting/enlightening philosophically.

e: Misspelled the damn title -.-

This post was edited by Funkymonk93 on Nov 6 2010 01:05am
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Oct 14 2010
Gold: 0.00
Nov 6 2010 09:17am
Love - Leo Buscaglia
Member
Posts: 5,343
Joined: Sep 13 2010
Gold: 500.40
Nov 16 2010 11:57pm
If you want classics,

A great sequence to read would be Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche. If you want more modern, try Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert Pirsig.
Member
Posts: 58,281
Joined: Jul 10 2006
Gold: 2,900.49
Nov 19 2010 09:52pm
Well, it depends on how deep and thorough you want your study of philosophy to be.

If you are just interested in philosophy a little bit I strongly recommend anything and everything by Albert Camus, Franz Kafka, Charles Bukowski, etc.

If you really want to develop a sound understanding of philosophy you can look into various reading lists that universities post online for their philosophy programs. There is a long list of reading from Plato and sometimes earlier all the way to contemporary philosophy.

Member
Posts: 1,034
Joined: Jul 13 2008
Gold: Locked
Dec 8 2010 03:47pm
I second the suggestion for Camus and Kafka. As a contrast you may want to look into Kierkegaard, he has some nice literary work that isn't too complicated, language-wise.

I've also heard Nietzsche has some wonderful writing (writing style that is, you may or may not think his ideas are wonderful), but all his work sits on my shelves unread.
Member
Posts: 58,281
Joined: Jul 10 2006
Gold: 2,900.49
Dec 10 2010 12:55pm
Quote (montecito @ Dec 8 2010 09:47pm)
I second the suggestion for Camus and Kafka. As a contrast you may want to look into Kierkegaard, he has some nice literary work that isn't too complicated, language-wise.

I've also heard Nietzsche has some wonderful writing (writing style that is, you may or may not think his ideas are wonderful), but all his work sits on my shelves unread.


Nietzsche and Kierkegaard are definitely must reads if you want to get into philosophy. For Nietzsche I'd recommend The Genealogy of Morals, Beyond Good and Evil and Human, All Too Human. Zarathustra is well written but layered with so much poetic rhetoric and literary devices it is hard to get meaning out of it, plus I'd imagine you are reading it secondhand (i.e. not in German) and, apparently, that makes it even harder to get meaning from it.
Member
Posts: 5,343
Joined: Sep 13 2010
Gold: 500.40
Dec 10 2010 03:02pm
You'll get a lot more out of Nietzsche if you read him in context with some of his precursors. I'd recommend at the very least reading Kant, Hegel, then Marx first. That way you can see some of the progression of German philosophy and make more sense out of where Nietzsche is coming from.
Member
Posts: 19,962
Joined: Oct 3 2005
Gold: 4,214.52
Dec 11 2010 12:46am
Machiavelli. U might want to read a critic work about some of his works since the originals might get a bit boring at some points while if u read a good critic on it it might be a lot easier, its ur choice though to read the original, he describes well the political issues of the renaissance, after the end of the middle ages.
Member
Posts: 1,034
Joined: Jul 13 2008
Gold: Locked
Dec 11 2010 10:10am
Quote (Madstrike @ Dec 11 2010 06:46am)
Machiavelli. U might want to read a critic work about some of his works since the originals might get a bit boring at some points while if u read a good critic on it it might be a lot easier, its ur choice though to read the original, he describes well the political issues of the renaissance, after the end of the middle ages.


One thing to keep in mind is that there are now a lot of scholars who believe The Prince was actually written as a satirical letter to Lorenzo di Medici and was not meant to be viewed as a serious work.
Member
Posts: 19,962
Joined: Oct 3 2005
Gold: 4,214.52
Dec 11 2010 12:54pm
Quote (montecito @ Dec 11 2010 04:10pm)
One thing to keep in mind is that there are now a lot of scholars who believe The Prince was actually written as a satirical letter to Lorenzo di Medici and was not meant to be viewed as a serious work.


I did not know about that, it makes sense though, since he was believed to be a republican, and u can see that in many of his writtings. But that(the prince) is not the most interesting of his works imo.
Go Back To Books & Literature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll