Quote (the.ice @ Thu, Mar 15 2007, 07:27pm)
Quote (hydrant @ Sun, Feb 25 2007, 08:17am)
Quote (Playboy23 @ Fri, Feb 23 2007, 06:12pm)
Was it just me or was the eragon book 100x better then the movie. Something about the LONG ass journey in the book made it worthwhile. Just seemed to fast in the movie.
the movie was terrible, this series had the potential to generate alotta income for the movie industry, not as much as lord of the rings, but a definate shitload. they rushed it, used a shitty producer and completey deviated from the actual story.. so many bullshit changes that really ruined it for me
agreed
wasn't good movie
didn't even seem like Brom had to TRAIN eragon like he did in the book it was just like boom hes dead boom eragon is powerful
the struggle was DEFF. not shown.
absolutely.. and how brom just comes outta nowhere and takes the dagger for eragon?
or how easily eragon just walks into the fuckin castle to save arya
i could go on and on... dont even get me started on Angela thats her name? im stoned right now so lol.. shes supposed to be like an old alchemist/witch.. its some 19 year old hot ass girl ( dont get me wrong, always enjoyable.. but its not what its supposed to be)
the only thing i felt the movie did well.. was the Rah'zac. they were exactly how i thought they should be.
also are the urgals supposed to just be basically savage vikings? my impression was they were a completely different race and that the Kull especially were like 12 foot motherfuckers
oh and jeremy irons was a good choice for brom. arent to many other people i think woulda fit
This post was edited by hydrant on Mar 26 2007 12:03am