Quote (lithfkn @ Aug 24 2013 02:11am)
By definition there is only one difference. A pro photographer gets paid, an amateur does not.
But what does amateur even mean? Is it everything bellow the paid level threshold? What about fine art photographers? Are they amateurs? The amateur/professional titles given out are kind of a joke. Just like touting a photography degree.
What does pro even mean? Because someone paid for your pictures does that make you pro? Does that elevate your work to some special level where it should be respected because someone paid for it? No.
I've always cringed when I've met someone that labels themselves a professional photographer. It's like people are so insecure and need special labels to show some advantage over someone else.
In terms of quality between the two? Often not much at all in my opinion.
90% of "professionals" don't do anything special and don't do anything that can't be taught from a lecture or workshop. I'd say 95% of the professional wedding and mainstream portrait photography industry is basically like this.
Very few photographers have any special quality in their work these days.
anyway, that's my rant lol
true
Quote (Csabi @ Aug 24 2013 03:20am)
Amateurs worry about equipment, Professionals worry about time, Masters worry about light
very true...
A professional is one who provides their services to a client. They know what they’re doing and have experience in the field of photography business, and because of those reasons they’re called professionals. It has to do with business and work ethics.
An amateur is one who wants or needs to learn about photography.