Quote (RecoveryChannel @ Aug 30 2010 01:40pm)
uhmm you´re saying it comes down to the 50d or the 7d. then you say you are looking for something in the 50D´s price range. soooooo..... that doesnt quite make sense because the 50D costs around 700-800 bucks atm and the 7D still costs around 1300. I wouldn´t call that the same price range tbh.
PS: I´m talking about €. but the proportion should be the same in the states or something.
I´d say, if you can afford the 7D, go for it. you´ll have urself a good semi-pro DSLR with alot of potential for great photos. but you should also be aware that there is a second part to where photos come from. at least as important as the body, are the lenses you use. And the good ones aren´t really cheaper than the actual bodies nowadays. So you might wanna take that into consideration.
So lets sum up.
Lets say you have 1500 bucks to spend.
For that bunch of money you can get the 7D combined with a standard kit lens.
BUT, there is a possibility that you´ll soon find out that you are looking for better lenses. Good lenses usually start from 500 bucks to OPEN END. Then you still dont have a tripod, a camera bag, filters, a flash etc etc etc.
So, lets say you get the 50D instead. You´ll spend around 800 bucks for the body, and invest the rest of ur money in a good lens and some equipment you´ll need. or get it as a kit with the standard 17-85mm lens.
I guess the Photos you´ll produce, as a beginner or amateur will pretty much look the same with both cameras. You´ll just have to ask yourself if you need all the extras the 7D has.
7d > 50d - to those who say 'it's not the camera, its the photographer' must have never enjoyed the higher-end cameras.