d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > Switching To Cannon L Series Lenses > Need Input (mostly An Excuse To Confirm)
1235Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
Feb 28 2010 08:34pm
Looking to buy:

EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Lens

Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Autofocus Lens

EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Lens

Total: 3488.00

Will be using with my trusty 5D Mark II.
Member
Posts: 5,173
Joined: May 21 2006
Gold: 3,116.00
Feb 28 2010 08:38pm
If you got the bucks to burn or there is an ROI ... go for it. Otherwise why?
Member
Posts: 16,893
Joined: Aug 25 2005
Gold: 8,601.26
Feb 28 2010 08:40pm
Quote (onepagememory @ Feb 28 2010 10:34pm)
Looking to buy:

EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Lens

Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Autofocus Lens

EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Lens

Total: 3488.00

Will be using with my trusty 5D Mark II.


Nice lens choices. They're all exceptional glass.

But do you really need the IS for the Macro lens? I know it could be alot more versatile depending on how you use it, but it's essentially the same optics as the non-is version which is approx half the price.

No comment on the 24-70 but as for the 70-200 f/4L IS. What are you using it for? Reason i asked is because if you're doing sports photography etc. The f/2.8 non-is could prove very useful, but the downside is that it isnt' as sharp as the f/4L IS version.
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
Feb 28 2010 08:52pm
Quote (Eek @ Feb 28 2010 07:40pm)
Nice lens choices. They're all exceptional glass.

But do you really need the IS for the Macro lens? I know it could be alot more versatile depending on how you use it, but it's essentially the same optics as the non-is version which is approx half the price.

No comment on the 24-70 but as for the 70-200 f/4L IS. What are you using it for? Reason i asked is because if you're doing sports photography etc. The f/2.8 non-is could prove very useful, but the downside is that it isnt' as sharp as the f/4L IS version.


I'm mostly a wedding photographer getting into other kinds of photography. I'm focusing a lot on sharpness.
Member
Posts: 16,893
Joined: Aug 25 2005
Gold: 8,601.26
Feb 28 2010 09:05pm
Quote (onepagememory @ Feb 28 2010 10:52pm)
I'm mostly a wedding photographer getting into other kinds of photography. I'm focusing a lot on sharpness.


I see i see. I guess the f/4L does have it's advantage in that front. Abit more versatile.. though the additional stop from the 2.8 might help in a dark church.

Why not get a set of primes if sharpness is one of your main concerns?
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
Feb 28 2010 09:37pm
Quote (Eek @ Feb 28 2010 08:05pm)
I see i see. I guess the f/4L does have it's advantage in that front. Abit more versatile.. though the additional stop from the 2.8 might help in a dark church.

Why not get a set of primes if sharpness is one of your main concerns?


Ahh you're right about the 2.8. But I've got other tools at my disposal compensate dark churches. ^^
Member
Posts: 5,173
Joined: May 21 2006
Gold: 3,116.00
Feb 28 2010 09:52pm
Quote (onepagememory @ Feb 28 2010 06:52pm)
I'm mostly a wedding photographer getting into other kinds of photography. I'm focusing a lot on sharpness.


It's funny but did you know that back in the old days ... photographers used to do things to take away sharpness from their lenses in many cases, especially portrait? It's kinda funny how the complete opposite is eaten up by the mainstream TODAY. It's funny though in the last couple of years many photogs are going retro and figuring out how to get that nice hazy retro portrait look of yesteryear.

I guess though if you are making money ... it's all about what the customer wants.
Member
Posts: 16,893
Joined: Aug 25 2005
Gold: 8,601.26
Feb 28 2010 10:19pm
Quote (Solarves @ Feb 28 2010 11:52pm)
It's funny but did you know that back in the old days ... photographers used to do things to take away sharpness from their lenses in many cases, especially portrait? It's kinda funny how the complete opposite is eaten up by the mainstream TODAY. It's funny though in the last couple of years many photogs are going retro and figuring out how to get that nice hazy retro portrait look of yesteryear.

I guess though if you are making money ... it's all about what the customer wants.


True, but i rather have a sharp lens then a soft lens : /

I can alway make them look softer in post processing. :S
Member
Posts: 14,659
Joined: Jan 27 2007
Gold: 78.16
Feb 28 2010 11:39pm
Quote (onepagememory @ Mar 1 2010 12:34pm)
Looking to buy:

EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Lens

Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Autofocus Lens

EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Lens

Total: 3488.00

Will be using with my trusty 5D Mark II.


Perfect 3 (Canon) lenses for wedding photography.

I use a 70-200 f4 IS and a 24-70 2.8. These are both PIN sharp. I'll post an example shortly with the 70-200.

Member
Posts: 14,659
Joined: Jan 27 2007
Gold: 78.16
Feb 28 2010 11:50pm
Shot from a corporate portrait series I shot:



100% crop unsharpened



This post was edited by lithfkn on Feb 28 2010 11:53pm
Go Back To Photography Topic List
1235Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll