d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > Can You Make A Pic Resolution Better
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 23,289
Joined: Jul 5 2006
Gold: 3.37
Warn: 10%
Feb 9 2010 10:51pm
w.o actually retaking the picture with a better camera?
Like can you do it on the computer?
Member
Posts: 16,893
Joined: Aug 25 2005
Gold: 8,601.26
Feb 10 2010 01:24am
You can't get something out of nothing.
Member
Posts: 2,167
Joined: Sep 6 2003
Gold: 270.50
Feb 10 2010 02:08am
You can stretch it...but it will not very good.
Member
Posts: 6,956
Joined: Feb 21 2008
Gold: 115.70
Feb 10 2010 02:45am
i have no time atm but discussing the option of making it getting a vector-grafic would be worth it imo

btw post the picture you are talking about

This post was edited by Nutribert on Feb 10 2010 02:46am
Member
Posts: 21,066
Joined: Dec 16 2005
Gold: 100.07
Feb 10 2010 03:31am
If the picture comes from a DSLR and is of good quality you can usually stretch it to twice it's initial size without any loss in quality.
Member
Posts: 1,191
Joined: Jan 6 2009
Gold: 259.00
Feb 10 2010 11:27am
In theory you could print it at res 350 current size, then give it to a photo shop to high-res scan it and blow it up.
Member
Posts: 36,992
Joined: Jan 6 2007
Gold: 7,821.00
Feb 10 2010 11:44am
I just tried interpolating up one of my pictures.
It's taken with a nikon d3000, which is a 10mp dslr.
First of all the picutre is cropped down to less then half (1728x2592 ~4.5mpixels) , and then I interpolated it up to 4724x7087 (~33.5 mpixels)
The result is satisfying.
So yes, you can stretch pictures pretty much if the picture is of good quality to begin with
Editing doesn't perform miracles
Member
Posts: 16,893
Joined: Aug 25 2005
Gold: 8,601.26
Feb 10 2010 01:31pm
Quote (Veilside @ Feb 10 2010 05:31am)
If the picture comes from a DSLR and is of good quality you can usually stretch it to twice it's initial size without any loss in quality.


That's only assuming he is working with the original RAW or tiff file.

If it has been output to a jpeg @ 800x600. Trying to stretch it to 1920x1200 will result it a drastically lower quality / choppy image.
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Feb 10 2010 01:35pm
I would say no. You're way better off just retaking the photo. It sucks, but that's the way it works.
Go Back To Photography Topic List
Add Reply New Topic New Poll