This is a bit vague, so sorry about that, but I'm wondering what the technique is called when you "move around" in a photo that's in a video. I don't just mean the effect where is zooms in/out. It seems like the picture is focused on one person or object then it appears as if your moving to a different angle as if it's a 360 degree view. I was trying to find an example but couldn't; anyone know what I'm talking about?

sort of like a panoramic shot, where you take multiple shots at different angles?

Maybe..but what I've seen was on an old photo, so I don't think they had multiple shots. The only place where I can think of is from the movie Expelled with Ben Stein...it has some pictures and they 'move around' in them..I'm going to try to find an example

you mean there is one frame but more than one of the same person in it performing different actions?

Maybe you mean multiple exposures?
Something like http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/PHOTOFILE/AADP005~Jason-Giambi-Multiple-Exposure-1-Photofile-Posters.jpg perhaps.

i think thats a composite shot mate

Alright, I found an example. It's at 0:45 and 0:56
(woman at table and family in yard)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_81K8kJT3k



I like that, but no, that's not what I'm talking about. I would assume you just have multiple layers for that and crop each photo, or copy each image of the guy.

This post was edited by bob08 on Feb 15 2009 12:45pm

that's called a multiple exposure

No, I think Sonorous's was multiple exposure..?

*I don't mean the people appearing in the 0:56 part. I mean the way it looks as if the picture were really a camcorder getting a dolly shot

This post was edited by bob08 on Feb 15 2009 12:49pm

nope his was a composite shot.

well dunno the name but its similar to a multiple exposure. a way to do it would be to take pictures of the order of the people that you want to appear then just paste the pictures into different layers, then change the opacity of the layers. That's not just one photo it will be quite a few.

im pretty sure, but i could be wrong