You've got wonderful ergonomics, if you know what I mean.

thats just wrong on so many levels

I don't expect you to understand our love. He is the Canon to my Nikon.

yeah i know that but you talking about another mans ergonomics is just scary

Well, what can I say... He handles well...

http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2010/03/01/autofocus-torture-test-updated-canon-1d-mkiv-nikon-d3s-added/

many people do poor choices, even the pros.

reuters and getty image shooters used canon in bejing olympics. d3s wasnt released by the time of the olympics and d3 seems to have pretty poor af in extreme situations(like sports) compared to 1d mkIII. d3s naturally beats mkIII, but mkIV beats d3s in af.

well at the last event all the big boys were there, getty, reuters, api, epa etc etc
and still most used the D3s, thy would far rather go with fps > af
i dont care what articles say, this is what i have experienced personally

on another note, i found they getty photogs really nice guys

1d mkIV has 10fps and d3s has 9fps, but 11fps if using small jpg on crop lens mode (5.1 MP), but i doubt that anyone shooting for high end customers would use crop lens + small jpg mode, since most news agencies require at least 10MP files. so in reality 1d mkIV has faster fps + it has better AF

This post was edited by Antichrist- on Jan 21 2011 09:02am

Read the comments on that page. It wasn't fair test, with the Nikon cameras not set up properly.

I think I`ll order a battery grip for my 5D Mark II now. after shooting with bg for over a year on my old cam, it feels like there´s missing something with the new body, even tho it´s much bigger.