lol

a change in position of an object with respect to time. lets analyze this sentence a little.

time in this case means the exposure time, and change in position of an object in this exposure time is what causes motion blur in a picture.

so how exactly are you going to capture a change in objects movement inside shutter speed without creating a motion blur?

what comes to that motion blur on #4, yes there is a barely noticeable amount of motion blur on the wings, but the picture itself doesent represent motion. if you go to a photography school this is the first thing they teach you about how to do your assignments

If you seriously try to tell me number 4 and 12 are not motion.. I don't feel like taking your comment seriously. Why do we need this childish complaining about the theme and what is good and bad about photos? If you don't like a picture, don't vote for it, and if you like one, vote!

Enough talking, we're only making it hard for the counter.

I'll vote #12 btw.

#4 and #12 would fall into theme catching the moment, thats the exact opposite of motion. im not complaining about pictures or the theme, im just saying that if there is a theme, people should follow it.

whats the point of even having a theme unless people dont post pictures that fit the theme and are still allowed to participate?

you can still express motion with a freez photo
[img]http://byfiles.storage.live.com/y1pY46w-BsHlDAgJs82N5Yg_VsPtWFGq1Ld1jlZOdKrhUDXPbbZrHccMfcxho_UoIfBByQQdQBihTw[/img]

#11

Antichrist- gets real butt hurt about just about everything these days. I just try to ignore him.

I vote #4 cus I like birds

This post was edited by bountiehunter on Nov 2 2010 03:04pm

no u!

im not hurt, im just trying to explain things to people that they dont seem to understand. yes it gets quite annoying when people fail to realize simple things even when you explain them in a way that shouldnt leave any misunderstandings, but i dont get butt hurt about it, ill just try to explain it again in another way in case they would get it when explained that way



thats again catching the moment, instead showing motion

If you don't want stuff to be frozen, go buy yourself a video camera.

This post was edited by SeaBas on Nov 2 2010 03:31pm

sorry i take back some of what i said. you dont need to have motion blur to show motion if you flash your strobe multiple times like this:



now im starting to feel that you are just fucking with me. explain what part of all of this you dont understand or ill just assume that you are playing dumb

Well that is your idea.
I have a different idea of motion.
It's kinda subjective imo.