d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > Rate The Photo Above You > Re-re-posting
Prev15859606162124Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Views: 21488Replies: 1235Track Topic
Member
Posts: 196
Joined: Feb 18 2011
Gold: 368.60
#591
Feb 19 2011 12:16pm
I liiiikkeeeeee
Member
Posts: 196
Joined: Feb 18 2011
Gold: 368.60
#592
Feb 19 2011 12:20pm
pfffff
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
#593
Feb 19 2011 12:35pm
Quote (Diablakias21 @ Feb 19 2011 11:20am)
pfffff


spaaaaaaam
Member
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sep 11 2008
Gold: 205.00
#594
Feb 19 2011 12:43pm
Quote (onepagememory @ 19 Feb 2011 22:35)
spaaaaaaam


2 posts and both of them here
Member
Posts: 36,992
Joined: Jan 6 2007
Gold: 7,821.00
#595
Feb 20 2011 11:08am
Quote (Verdena @ 19 Feb 2011 18:35)
I like first better, i'll give it a 5/10

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5054/5459086830_f8d6168fc2_b.jpg


Love it! Great sharpness, subject and composition!
9/10

Member
Posts: 28,500
Joined: Jun 26 2006
Gold: 9,163.90
Trader: Trusted
#596
Feb 20 2011 11:49am
Quote (Fil @ Feb 20 2011 06:08pm)
Love it! Great sharpness, subject and composition!
9/10

http://images4.bilddagboken.se/82/_u8/_u4/_u3/_u2/_u5/u843256/f/o/a40d5cd6bb809b6324efcca2bbf8f337cf2cc726685df5d41e7929301ad11074.jpg


I know what you tried to do but i don't like the outcome :( .
I would have also cropped a bit of the upper part, that white on the left is bad to me.
5/10

I would have framed it this way to suit the rule of thirds more, then played a bit to make it look less overexposed:









This post was edited by Verdena on Feb 20 2011 12:00pm
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
#597
Feb 20 2011 11:55am
Quote (Verdena @ Feb 20 2011 10:49am)
I know what you tried to do but i don't like the outcome :( .
I would have also cropped a bit of the upper part, that white on the left is bad to me.
5/10

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5056/5459217736_365e97d39b_z.jpg



That tiger looks so boss. 10/10
I like your edit. You point out some good stuff, hopefully it is appreciated.

This post was edited by onepagememory on Feb 20 2011 11:59am
Member
Posts: 32,538
Joined: Dec 6 2007
Gold: 1,945.00
#598
Feb 20 2011 07:21pm
Agreed with onepage, and nice framing.

I dont know about it being a 10, not that its a bad picture by any means, I guess Im just not that big on zoo photos.

Member
Posts: 1,191
Joined: Jan 6 2009
Gold: 259.00
#599
Feb 20 2011 07:22pm
Quote (Verdena @ Feb 20 2011 09:49am)
I know what you tried to do but i don't like the outcome :( .
I would have also cropped a bit of the upper part, that white on the left is bad to me.
5/10

I would have framed it this way to suit the rule of thirds more, then played a bit to make it look less overexposed:

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/9852/btcomp.jpg





http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5056/5459217736_365e97d39b_z.jpg


Nice composition, but one rookie mistake: too much contrast in processing.
You've sacrificed a lot of depth for "boldness".

Member
Posts: 13,452
Joined: Jan 14 2008
Gold: 116.00
#600
Feb 21 2011 09:45am
7/10 - The highlights add a lot of depth to the image but the other tones are a little muted. It might also be better if you made the horizon parallel to the photo's edge.



E- 5x4 large format

This post was edited by Terrible_One on Feb 21 2011 09:46am
Go Back To Photography Topic List
Prev15859606162124Next
Closed New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact