Quote (Xandriia @ Apr 16 2010 01:14pm)
This might be a stupid question, but arent they all the same out of the box? I cant imagine one being less sharp than another.
And I dont really, I blew a lot on the initial purchase. But Im serious about it and I keep hearing you get what you pay for when it comes to photography.
Nah, definitely not the same out of the box, especially the cheaper (not implying shit) lenses.
When an item is mass produced, it is impossible to get it 100% correct to exact specifications, that's why there are always tolerances in manufacturing.
When you purchase an expensive lens, such as the Canon 400mm 2.8L IS, you are guaranteed quality as they are hand assembled, calibrated to tight tolerances and thoroughly checked before leaving the door.
Photography is the worst industry when it comes to getting what you pay for

Quote (Chantal7 @ Apr 16 2010 02:10pm)
I have a few questions about that too...
#1. How do you go about finding out if your sigma is sharp or not? I have a sigma 10-20mm
#2. What can you do if you got a dull one?
Well, post a picure on here with 100% centre crop and 100% corner crops and we can see what the Sigma is up to.
If you get a dull one it's a simple process of sending it back to Sigma for proper calibration.
This post was edited by lithfkn on Apr 15 2010 10:32pm