d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > Photography Section General Discussion
Prev13132333435145Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 14,659
Joined: Jan 27 2007
Gold: 78.16
Apr 15 2010 08:02pm
Nothing wrong with 2nd hand lenses. But I'd be cautious buying 2nd hand stuff online without seeing it first hand.

3rd party gear like Sigma/Tokina etc are fine as long as you get a good copy (has to be sharp!)
Member
Posts: 32,538
Joined: Dec 6 2007
Gold: 1,945.00
Apr 15 2010 08:20pm
Theres such a huge price difference between the sigma 105mm macro lens and the Nikon 105mm macro lens.

I just dont get why, and my bf is opposed to anything third party (he sells cameras all day so he usually talks over me when it comes to these things).
Member
Posts: 14,659
Joined: Jan 27 2007
Gold: 78.16
Apr 15 2010 09:00pm
Quote (Xandriia @ Apr 16 2010 12:20pm)
Theres such a huge price difference between the sigma 105mm macro lens and the Nikon 105mm macro lens.

I just dont get why, and my bf is opposed to anything third party (he sells cameras all day so he usually talks over me when it comes to these things).


If you can get a sharp Sigma lens than there is nothing wrong with it. There is probably a 85% chance the Sigma will be sharp from the box, whereas the Nikon will be sharp 99.5% of the time.

Sigma isn't a small, cheap ass company either.

But if you have the cash to splash, definitely hit the Nikon up.
Member
Posts: 32,538
Joined: Dec 6 2007
Gold: 1,945.00
Apr 15 2010 09:14pm
Quote (lithfkn @ Apr 15 2010 10:00pm)
If you can get a sharp Sigma lens than there is nothing wrong with it. There is probably a 85% chance the Sigma will be sharp from the box, whereas the Nikon will be sharp 99.5% of the time.

Sigma isn't a small, cheap ass company either.

But if you have the cash to splash, definitely hit the Nikon up.


This might be a stupid question, but arent they all the same out of the box? I cant imagine one being less sharp than another.

And I dont really, I blew a lot on the initial purchase. But Im serious about it and I keep hearing you get what you pay for when it comes to photography.
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Apr 15 2010 10:10pm
Quote (Xandriia @ Apr 15 2010 09:14pm)
This might be a stupid question, but arent they all the same out of the box? I cant imagine one being less sharp than another.

And I dont really, I blew a lot on the initial purchase. But Im serious about it and I keep hearing you get what you pay for when it comes to photography.


This i
Quote (lithfkn @ Apr 15 2010 09:00pm)
If you can get a sharp Sigma lens than there is nothing wrong with it. There is probably a 85% chance the Sigma will be sharp from the box, whereas the Nikon will be sharp 99.5% of the time.

Sigma isn't a small, cheap ass company either.

But if you have the cash to splash, definitely hit the Nikon up.


I have a few questions about that too...

#1. How do you go about finding out if your sigma is sharp or not? I have a sigma 10-20mm

#2. What can you do if you got a dull one?
Member
Posts: 14,659
Joined: Jan 27 2007
Gold: 78.16
Apr 15 2010 10:32pm
Quote (Xandriia @ Apr 16 2010 01:14pm)
This might be a stupid question, but arent they all the same out of the box? I cant imagine one being less sharp than another.

And I dont really, I blew a lot on the initial purchase. But Im serious about it and I keep hearing you get what you pay for when it comes to photography.


Nah, definitely not the same out of the box, especially the cheaper (not implying shit) lenses.

When an item is mass produced, it is impossible to get it 100% correct to exact specifications, that's why there are always tolerances in manufacturing.

When you purchase an expensive lens, such as the Canon 400mm 2.8L IS, you are guaranteed quality as they are hand assembled, calibrated to tight tolerances and thoroughly checked before leaving the door.

Photography is the worst industry when it comes to getting what you pay for :rofl:

Quote (Chantal7 @ Apr 16 2010 02:10pm)
I have a few questions about that too...

#1. How do you go about finding out if your sigma is sharp or not? I have a sigma 10-20mm

#2. What can you do if you got a dull one?


Well, post a picure on here with 100% centre crop and 100% corner crops and we can see what the Sigma is up to.

If you get a dull one it's a simple process of sending it back to Sigma for proper calibration.

This post was edited by lithfkn on Apr 15 2010 10:32pm
Member
Posts: 32,538
Joined: Dec 6 2007
Gold: 1,945.00
Apr 15 2010 10:55pm
Hm, well thanks for all the help, I have a better idea of what Im going to do now :)
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Apr 15 2010 11:10pm
Quote (lithfkn @ Apr 15 2010 10:32pm)
Nah, definitely not the same out of the box, especially the cheaper (not implying shit) lenses.

When an item is mass produced, it is impossible to get it 100% correct to exact specifications, that's why there are always tolerances in manufacturing.

When you purchase an expensive lens, such as the Canon 400mm 2.8L IS, you are guaranteed quality as they are hand assembled, calibrated to tight tolerances and thoroughly checked before leaving the door.

Photography is the worst industry when it comes to getting what you pay for :rofl:



Well, post a picure on here with 100% centre crop and 100% corner crops and we can see what the Sigma is up to.

If you get a dull one it's a simple process of sending it back to Sigma for proper calibration.


Oh okay. How do I do a 100% crop? I am curious now.
Member
Posts: 36,992
Joined: Jan 6 2007
Gold: 7,821.00
Apr 16 2010 01:10am
Quote (Chantal7 @ 16 Apr 2010 07:10)
Oh okay. How do I do a 100% crop? I am curious now.


There is probably many ways, but just cropping a picture without any rescaling gives a 100% crop :P
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
Apr 16 2010 01:28am
ffs double post
sorry

This post was edited by Futurama on Apr 16 2010 01:29am
Go Back To Photography Topic List
Prev13132333435145Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll