Rate The Photo Above You. - Topic

Eek

Member

Posts: 16,893

Joined: Aug 25 2005

Gold: 8,601.26

#311

Jul 30 2010 11:38pm

Quote (CitizenScuba @ Jul 31 2010 01:33am)

Eek... I demand you change your ava pic thing back to what it was... You make me so confused

Lol.. i'll change it back if you can tell me what my previous ava was. Mwahah.

Plus. i won't have this for long.. just for her bday

**To whoever is reading this, don't forget my photo hasn't been rated yet!!

This post was edited by Eek on Jul 30 2010 11:39pm

CitizenScuba

Member

Posts: 6,029

Joined: Sep 23 2007

Gold: 0.00

#312

Jul 30 2010 11:49pm

Snorlax. Ftw.

Eek

Member

Posts: 16,893

Joined: Aug 25 2005

Gold: 8,601.26

#313

Jul 30 2010 11:58pm

Quote (CitizenScuba @ Jul 31 2010 01:49am)

Snorlax. Ftw.

Oh snap!! You actually remembered

I'll change it back tomorrow LOL.

**To whoever is reading this, don't forget my photo hasn't been rated yet!!

onepagememory

Member

Posts: 18,010

Joined: Apr 8 2008

Gold: 8,653.74

#314

Jul 31 2010 09:00pm

Quote (Eek @ Jul 30 2010 05:55pm)

I'm not digging the composition too much. The shutter is way too fast IMO. And the colors are completely washed out.

Code

Camera Maker: OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera Model: FE5010,X915
Image Date: 2010:04:16 14:02:50
Focal Length: 14.1mm (35mm equivalent: 81mm)
Aperture: f/4.8
Exposure Time: 0.0063 s (1/160)
ISO equiv: 64
Exposure Bias: +1.30 EV
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: program (Auto)
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (Auto)
Color Space: sRGB
Caption: OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

According to your EXIF data, i would stop down the lens to f/16 or f/20~ if you camera has override functions. I would actually reduce the exposure compensation to keep the rocks semi-dark. Use a CPL filter or just stick a polarized lens in front to reduce some of the glare.

2/10 overall

Playing with ultra thin DoF. Only eyes in sharp focus

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m223/Jdmhoodz/IMG_5213-2.jpg

for jsp standards, 10/10
You're really talented. If only I had access to people that are as talented as you everyday... We'd take over the world

Eek

Member

Posts: 16,893

Joined: Aug 25 2005

Gold: 8,601.26

#315

Jul 31 2010 09:32pm

Quote (onepagememory @ Jul 31 2010 11:00pm)

for jsp standards, 10/10
You're really talented. If only I had access to people that are as talented as you everyday... We'd take over the world

Am i reading too deep where i see another meaning?

It feels really awkward hearing these comments.. i know there are better photographers on this forums.. actually i've seen quite a couple. While i may have came a long way since i started photography back in December.. i am no where close to some people here. I still consider myself a noob

I want constructive criticism

Futurama

Member

Posts: 11,814

Joined: Feb 4 2006

Gold: 8.09

#316

Jul 31 2010 09:34pm

Quote (Eek @ Jul 30 2010 06:55pm)

2/10 overall

Playing with ultra thin DoF. Only eyes in sharp focus

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m223/Jdmhoodz/IMG_5213-2.jpg

Nice shot mr Eeeek!
I assume it was taken with the 100L?
hehe I guess I am having a hard time to convince myself to get that lens simply because I will only have use for it during two or three months every year

and other than for macro shots the 135L seems to be superior

or maybe you could convince me otherwise

Eek

Member

Posts: 16,893

Joined: Aug 25 2005

Gold: 8,601.26

#317

Jul 31 2010 09:35pm

Quote (Futurama @ Jul 31 2010 11:34pm)

and other than for macro shots the 135L seems to be superior

or maybe you could convince me otherwise

Um.. what if i told you... that it was taken with a 135L

No tubes, no TC.. just straight up 135L.. Straight from camera.. i only cropped a little

Futurama

Member

Posts: 11,814

Joined: Feb 4 2006

Gold: 8.09

#318

Jul 31 2010 09:47pm

Quote (Eek @ Jul 31 2010 09:35pm)

Um.. what if i told you... that it was taken with a 135L

No tubes, no TC.. just straight up 135L.. Straight from camera.. i only cropped a little

ah! Well I am not surprised at all but I thought you would use your 100L for shots like this

So what aperture did you use?

hehe here is one I took earlier this morning though I had to do a 70% crop but I think it's reasonably sharp.

onepagememory

Member

Posts: 18,010

Joined: Apr 8 2008

Gold: 8,653.74

#319

Jul 31 2010 10:22pm

Quote (Eek @ Jul 31 2010 08:32pm)

Am i reading too deep where i see another meaning?

I want constructive criticism

lol what other meaning?

Eek

Member

Posts: 16,893

Joined: Aug 25 2005

Gold: 8,601.26

#320

Jul 31 2010 10:23pm

Quote (Futurama @ Jul 31 2010 11:47pm)

ah! Well I am not surprised at all but I thought you would use your 100L for shots like this

So what aperture did you use?

hehe here is one I took earlier this morning though I had to do a 70% crop but I think it's reasonably sharp.

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4152/4847037001_9efffebea1_b.jpg

I didn't have the 100L that day. I learned not to carry all my glass now.. LOL thing does get heavy at times. I shot the previous image @ f/2.5. Stopped it down just abit.

Nice pic you have there too. I'm still amazed everytime i see a pic taken by the 135L, the way it throws the backgound out of focus is phenomenal. What aperture was that shot at..? f/5ish? I like how you caught the bee in mid-air but the shot seems slightly under-exposed to me.

8/10

Quote (onepagememory @ Aug 1 2010 12:22am)

lol what other meaning?

I sense a little sarcasm :[

This post was edited by Eek on Jul 31 2010 10:24pm

Go Back To Photography Topic List