d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > Fall Colors Attempt #2.
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
Oct 30 2010 08:06am
Awesome shots bro!

WTF!
2 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 1 Anonymous): Futurama

hahaha you are a stalker magnet :lol:
Member
Posts: 17,788
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 20.00
Oct 30 2010 08:25am
Quote (Eek @ Oct 30 2010 04:14am)
Thanks all!



The Lee Big stopper :P



Haha, if time allows.. i'm heading out this sunday again. :P You shoot go out and shoot too!



I know :( How about this other version? It's a 1.6 second exposure



What about this one? It's alot shorter :P

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m223/Jdmhoodz/IMG_7831.jpg


I think the camera was moved during this shot(?)

Btw I have no idea if my photo for the contest qualifies as motion :P

This post was edited by SeaBas on Oct 30 2010 08:25am
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Oct 30 2010 08:31am
What a beautiful place. The third one there looks awesome. Regardless of how many seconds you exposed it, I still think it looks cool. I have yet to try a photo like this.

This post was edited by Chantal7 on Oct 30 2010 08:32am
Member
Posts: 8,493
Joined: Jun 19 2003
Gold: 1,293.00
Oct 30 2010 10:19am
The shots are a bit soft, then I saw your 75 sec exposure time. You will be able to achieve the water effect you're looking for (the water looks great btw) with a lot less shutter speed than that...more like 1/4 - 1 second. The surrounding details will obviously be a lot sharper as well.
Member
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sep 11 2008
Gold: 205.00
Oct 30 2010 10:30am
Quote (bergmann @ 30 Oct 2010 20:19)
The shots are a bit soft, then I saw your 75 sec exposure time.  You will be able to achieve the water effect you're looking for (the water looks great btw) with a lot less shutter speed than that...more like 1/4 - 1 second.  The surrounding details will obviously be a lot sharper as well.


that all depends on the speed of the flowing water
Member
Posts: 17,788
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 20.00
Oct 30 2010 10:35am
Quote (bergmann @ Oct 30 2010 04:19pm)
The shots are a bit soft, then I saw your 75 sec exposure time. You will be able to achieve the water effect you're looking for (the water looks great btw) with a lot less shutter speed than that...more like 1/4 - 1 second. The surrounding details will obviously be a lot sharper as well.


Doesn't have to to make any difference. Leafs will never be 100% sharp with a slow shutter speed. As long as you have a tripod you can make exposures of an hour that are still sharp as long as you have a more static subject of course.
Member
Posts: 8,493
Joined: Jun 19 2003
Gold: 1,293.00
Oct 30 2010 10:40am
Quote (jayandnix @ Oct 30 2010 11:30am)
that all depends on the speed of the flowing water


True, but there are small waterfalls involved here which will be falling at enough speed.

Quote (SeaBas @ Oct 30 2010 11:35am)
Doesn't have to to make any difference. Leafs will never be 100% sharp with a slow shutter speed. As long as you have a tripod you can make exposures of an hour that are still sharp as long as you have a more static subject of course.


Not totally true, because the wind and other things are going to move the tripod a bit also. Put your camera on live-view mode, zoom in 10x and you can see that movements that you can't see or feel still cause slight camera movement. The leaves won't be 100% sharp at 1 sec or 1/4 sec either, but they'll be a lot sharper than they are at 75 secs.
Member
Posts: 17,788
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 20.00
Oct 30 2010 10:46am
Quote (bergmann @ Oct 30 2010 04:40pm)
True, but there are small waterfalls involved here which will be falling at enough speed.



Not totally true, because the wind and other things are going to move the tripod a bit also. Put your camera on live-view mode, zoom in 10x and you can see that movements that you can't see or feel still cause slight camera movement. The leaves won't be 100% sharp at 1 sec or 1/4 sec either, but they'll be a lot sharper than they are at 75 secs.


A good tripod doesn't move other than through the universe because it is on earth. Not notice-able at least.

This is the reason, though, why I don't use any trees in long exposures when I want them to be completely sharp.
Member
Posts: 8,493
Joined: Jun 19 2003
Gold: 1,293.00
Oct 30 2010 10:52am
You could get away with 1/4 sec on a day with minimal wind and wind up with a sharp shot, but you're right. HDR (which was mentioned earlier) could be a solution for this. A long exposure can also do weird things to colors.
Member
Posts: 17,788
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 20.00
Oct 30 2010 10:55am
Quote (bergmann @ Oct 30 2010 04:52pm)
You could get away with 1/4 sec on a day with minimal wind and wind up with a sharp shot, but you're right. HDR (which was mentioned earlier) could be a solution for this. A long exposure can also do weird things to colors.


Do you mean through using filters? They often give a red/purple/brown glow over your pictures.
Go Back To Photography Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll